An Advanced Clustering with Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices and a Comparison Against Spectral Clustering, and K-Means

In an effort to increase computing efficiency, this work presents an improved spectral clustering technique that approximates the affinity matrix using Toeplitz and Circulant matrices. To preserve the quality of the clustering, we take advantage of the spectral characteristics of the similarity graph's Laplacian matrix. The Iris flower, Wine Quality, and Mushroom datasets are used to assess the approach. The following six clustering methods are contrasted: PCA combined with either spectral or K-means clustering, K-means clustering (with and without matrix approximation), and spectral clustering (with and without matrix approximation). The Silhouette Score, Fl score, precision, recall, and Adj usted Rand Index (ARI) are used to evaluate performance. The suggested method produces similar results to traditional methods with a significant reduction in computational cost, according to the results. In order to fully investigate the advantages of these matrices, architectures in spectral clustering are explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/delcon64804.2024.10866042
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Advanced Clustering with Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices and a Comparison Against Spectral Clustering, and K-Means

Rohan Ghosh, Sarada Jayan, Thotapalli Sri Surya Manideep, Sneha Saragadam
Face and Expression Recognition
article

An Advanced Clustering with Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices and a Comparison Against Spectral Clustering, and K-Means

Rohan Ghosh, Sarada Jayan, Thotapalli Sri Surya Manideep, Sneha Saragadam
article en

Abstract

In an effort to increase computing efficiency, this work presents an improved spectral clustering technique that approximates the affinity matrix using Toeplitz and Circulant matrices. To preserve the quality of the clustering, we take advantage of the spectral characteristics of the similarity graph's Laplacian matrix. The Iris flower, Wine Quality, and Mushroom datasets are used to assess the approach. The following six clustering methods are contrasted: PCA combined with either spectral or K-means clustering, K-means clustering (with and without matrix approximation), and spectral clustering (with and without matrix approximation). The Silhouette Score, Fl score, precision, recall, and Adj usted Rand Index (ARI) are used to evaluate performance. The suggested method produces similar results to traditional methods with a significant reduction in computational cost, according to the results. In order to fully investigate the advantages of these matrices, architectures in spectral clustering are explored.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Face and Expression Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Advanced Clustering with Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices and a Comparison Against Spectral Clustering, and K-Means — Rohan Ghosh, Sarada Jayan, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS