Can LLaMA 3 Understand Monetary Policy?

This study provides an in-depth examination of LLaMA 3's performance on a domain-specific task, specifically classifying monetary policy texts. The aim is to categorize these texts as hawkish, dovish, or neutral by using a prompt to assess LLaMA 3'<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$s$</tex> understanding of finance-related knowledge anticipated to be acquired during its pretraining. Experimental results demonstrate that LLaMA 3 has indeed developed the necessary commonsense knowledge to interpret monetary policy, as it surpasses both major and random baselines. To further understand its performance, we also analyze the consistency of its impressive results across different model inputs, including the number of tokens, nouns, and verbs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icacte62428.2024.10871796
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can LLaMA 3 Understand Monetary Policy?

Zhaomin Xiao, Jinran Zhang, Zhuoer Xu, Zhelu Mai et al.
4 citations
Economic Theory and Policy
3.31
article

Can LLaMA 3 Understand Monetary Policy?

Zhaomin Xiao, Jinran Zhang, Zhuoer Xu, Zhelu Mai, Yingyi Wu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth examination of LLaMA 3's performance on a domain-specific task, specifically classifying monetary policy texts. The aim is to categorize these texts as hawkish, dovish, or neutral by using a prompt to assess LLaMA 3'<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$s$</tex> understanding of finance-related knowledge anticipated to be acquired during its pretraining. Experimental results demonstrate that LLaMA 3 has indeed developed the necessary commonsense knowledge to interpret monetary policy, as it surpasses both major and random baselines. To further understand its performance, we also analyze the consistency of its impressive results across different model inputs, including the number of tokens, nouns, and verbs.

University of North Texas (US), Hewlett Packard Enterprise (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic Theory and Policy
3.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.