A Multi-Model Fusion Approach for Transformer Fault Detection

Addressing the weak generalization capability and suboptimal prediction performance of single mechanistic and data-driven models, this paper proposes a transformer fault detection method based on the fusion of mechanism and data models. Firstly, vibration and current data are collected on-site to train the SVM vibration model and the Adaboost current model. Secondly, current simulation data is obtained using laboratory simulation software. This simulation data, combined with the current data collected under the same conditions on-site, is used as input to train the GBDT error compensation model. Finally, these three models are used as inputs to the GRNN, completing the overall model design. This fusion of mechanistic and data-driven models not only addresses the parameter mismatch issue of the mechanistic model under complex working conditions but also deeply mines time-series data. Experimental results show that The mean squared error of the fusion model is 0.002 lower than that of the data model, and the coefficient of determination is improved by 5.07% compared to the mechanistic model, enhancing the overall predictive accuracy of the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciba62489.2024.10868380
Primary Topic
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Model Fusion Approach for Transformer Fault Detection

Ligang Li, Wei Zhang, Ke Zhou, Shaoming Pan et al.
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
article

A Multi-Model Fusion Approach for Transformer Fault Detection

Ligang Li, Wei Zhang, Ke Zhou, Shaoming Pan, Chengwei Huang
article en

Abstract

Addressing the weak generalization capability and suboptimal prediction performance of single mechanistic and data-driven models, this paper proposes a transformer fault detection method based on the fusion of mechanism and data models. Firstly, vibration and current data are collected on-site to train the SVM vibration model and the Adaboost current model. Secondly, current simulation data is obtained using laboratory simulation software. This simulation data, combined with the current data collected under the same conditions on-site, is used as input to train the GBDT error compensation model. Finally, these three models are used as inputs to the GRNN, completing the overall model design. This fusion of mechanistic and data-driven models not only addresses the parameter mismatch issue of the mechanistic model under complex working conditions but also deeply mines time-series data. Experimental results show that The mean squared error of the fusion model is 0.002 lower than that of the data model, and the coefficient of determination is improved by 5.07% compared to the mechanistic model, enhancing the overall predictive accuracy of the model.

Electric Power Research Institute (US), Shenyang Institute of Automation (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Robotics
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.