Linear Reinforcement Learning for Energy Storage Systems Optimal Dispatch

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising solution for defining the optimal dispatch of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) in distributed energy systems. However, a notable gap exists in the literature: a lack of comprehensive and fair comparisons between different RL algorithms, particularly between linear and nonlinear approaches. This study critically evaluates the trade-offs between computational efficiency and operational accuracy among various Linear RL (LRL) strategies and compares them against the nonlinear Deep-Q-Network (DQN) algorithm. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study benchmarks the model-based Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) results to assess and compare these algorithms’ convergence, training efficiency, and optimization accuracy. Results indicate that while LRL approaches the operational cost accuracy of DQN, it faces significant trade-offs in computational efficiency and struggles with generalization across larger and varied datasets. The results illuminate critical areas for further development in LRL methodologies, particularly in enhancing their adaptability and generalization capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isgteurope62998.2024.10863043
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear Reinforcement Learning for Energy Storage Systems Optimal Dispatch

Peter Pálenský, Shuyi Gao, Edgar Mauricio Salazar Duque, Shengren Hou et al.
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
article

Linear Reinforcement Learning for Energy Storage Systems Optimal Dispatch

Peter Pálenský, Shuyi Gao, Edgar Mauricio Salazar Duque, Shengren Hou, Pedro P. Vergara
article en

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising solution for defining the optimal dispatch of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) in distributed energy systems. However, a notable gap exists in the literature: a lack of comprehensive and fair comparisons between different RL algorithms, particularly between linear and nonlinear approaches. This study critically evaluates the trade-offs between computational efficiency and operational accuracy among various Linear RL (LRL) strategies and compares them against the nonlinear Deep-Q-Network (DQN) algorithm. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study benchmarks the model-based Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) results to assess and compare these algorithms’ convergence, training efficiency, and optimization accuracy. Results indicate that while LRL approaches the operational cost accuracy of DQN, it faces significant trade-offs in computational efficiency and struggles with generalization across larger and varied datasets. The results illuminate critical areas for further development in LRL methodologies, particularly in enhancing their adaptability and generalization capabilities.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linear Reinforcement Learning for Energy Storage Systems Optimal Dispatch — Peter Pálenský, Shuyi Gao, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS