Scalable and Lightweight Machine Learning Based Load Forecast: Netload versus Disaggregrated Forecast

This paper develops lightweight and adaptive demand forecast models for a residential building integrated with solar photovoltaics using scalable and adaptive deep learning algorithms, i.e., long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent units (GRU). First, the forecast models have been trained using the real measurement data from a residential building. Then, the models have been used in case studies using the real-time data for two forecasting approaches: i) netload forecast; ii) disaggregated forecasts, i.e., forecasting the load and PV generation separately. The performance of the two forecasting approaches have been compared. The results from case studies showed that disaggregated forecast approach was superior (with an overall RMSE of 2.03 kW for the building with max demand of 10.53 kW) than the aggregated forecast approach (with an overall RMSE of 2.63 kW). Case studies results have also demonstrated that the models are scalable with more data, and are lightweights, hence, suitable for resource-constraint devices. Although LSTM shows advantages in accuracy, GRU shows better scalability in terms of computational efficiency. The models can be utilized by various stakeholders, such as building owners, grid operators, etc., and can be adapted to other types of buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isgteurope62998.2024.10863505
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scalable and Lightweight Machine Learning Based Load Forecast: Netload versus Disaggregrated Forecast

David Steen, Alexander N. Ndife, Lê Anh Tuấn
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Scalable and Lightweight Machine Learning Based Load Forecast: Netload versus Disaggregrated Forecast

David Steen, Alexander N. Ndife, Lê Anh Tuấn
article en

Abstract

This paper develops lightweight and adaptive demand forecast models for a residential building integrated with solar photovoltaics using scalable and adaptive deep learning algorithms, i.e., long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent units (GRU). First, the forecast models have been trained using the real measurement data from a residential building. Then, the models have been used in case studies using the real-time data for two forecasting approaches: i) netload forecast; ii) disaggregated forecasts, i.e., forecasting the load and PV generation separately. The performance of the two forecasting approaches have been compared. The results from case studies showed that disaggregated forecast approach was superior (with an overall RMSE of 2.03 kW for the building with max demand of 10.53 kW) than the aggregated forecast approach (with an overall RMSE of 2.63 kW). Case studies results have also demonstrated that the models are scalable with more data, and are lightweights, hence, suitable for resource-constraint devices. Although LSTM shows advantages in accuracy, GRU shows better scalability in terms of computational efficiency. The models can be utilized by various stakeholders, such as building owners, grid operators, etc., and can be adapted to other types of buildings.

Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scalable and Lightweight Machine Learning Based Load Forecast: Netload versus Disaggregrated Forecast — David Steen, Alexander N. Ndife, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS