Response to Ford, Morley, and Sankary, “Attending to Trauma, Balancing Power, and Prioritizing Stakeholders in Ethics Consultation”

AbstractIn their article "Attending to Trauma, Balancing Power, and Prioritizing Stakeholders in Ethics Consultation," Ford, Morley, and Sankary respond to my argument about surrogate trauma and prioritization. They offer the most challenging set of arguments against my thesis. They also offer the sharpest critique of Lanphier and Anani's original TIEC proposal. Ford, Morley, and Sankary likely represent the reaction that most professional clinical ethicists will have to my proposal, and their voice is essential in this debate, both for their own philosophical insights and for the representation of the views of many in the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Ethics
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733390
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to Ford, Morley, and Sankary, “Attending to Trauma, Balancing Power, and Prioritizing Stakeholders in Ethics Consultation”

Autumn Fiester
1 citations
The Journal of Clinical Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Response to Ford, Morley, and Sankary, “Attending to Trauma, Balancing Power, and Prioritizing Stakeholders in Ethics Consultation”

Autumn Fiester
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AbstractIn their article "Attending to Trauma, Balancing Power, and Prioritizing Stakeholders in Ethics Consultation," Ford, Morley, and Sankary respond to my argument about surrogate trauma and prioritization. They offer the most challenging set of arguments against my thesis. They also offer the sharpest critique of Lanphier and Anani's original TIEC proposal. Ford, Morley, and Sankary likely represent the reaction that most professional clinical ethicists will have to my proposal, and their voice is essential in this debate, both for their own philosophical insights and for the representation of the views of many in the field.

The Journal of Clinical EthicsVol. 36(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.