Evaluation of the Moon Jae-in Administration's Defense Policy and Military Strategy

In the peaceful mood of inter-Korean reconciliation and cooperation, defense policy was often faced with the dilemma of confronting the conflicting strategic demands of maintaining firm defense posture and building military confidence. As North Korea policy occupies a key position in the national security strategy, it has had a significant impact on defense policy, which has led to ideological cleavage and confusion in the formulation of policies and strategies. This paper evaluates the Moon Jae-in Administration's defense policy from the perspective of the dynamics between politics and the military. The core argument of the paper is that political influence in the military field has been excessively exerted in the process of inter-Korean military agreement and its implementation which has led to the detriment of the overall defense policy and the establishment of military strategy. In the process of arms control, careful examination and judgment at the military and strategic levels were not properly reflected, leaving many questions in the historical evaluation of the September 19 military agreement. The military has focused on tangible measures to implement the military agreement, and as a result, efforts and capabilities to build a counter strategies and system to North Korea's nuclear threat have been dispersed. These cases suggest the importance of prudent and rational judgment from the standpoint of national interest on the “proposition” that the military should be subordinated to “political” purposes, and that a strategy is needed to prepare for changes in North-South relations in the long term.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46226/jss.2024.11.31.3.251
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Moon Jae-in Administration's Defense Policy and Military Strategy

Inseok Yoo
Educational Systems and Policies
article

Evaluation of the Moon Jae-in Administration's Defense Policy and Military Strategy

Inseok Yoo
article en

Abstract

In the peaceful mood of inter-Korean reconciliation and cooperation, defense policy was often faced with the dilemma of confronting the conflicting strategic demands of maintaining firm defense posture and building military confidence. As North Korea policy occupies a key position in the national security strategy, it has had a significant impact on defense policy, which has led to ideological cleavage and confusion in the formulation of policies and strategies. This paper evaluates the Moon Jae-in Administration's defense policy from the perspective of the dynamics between politics and the military. The core argument of the paper is that political influence in the military field has been excessively exerted in the process of inter-Korean military agreement and its implementation which has led to the detriment of the overall defense policy and the establishment of military strategy. In the process of arms control, careful examination and judgment at the military and strategic levels were not properly reflected, leaving many questions in the historical evaluation of the September 19 military agreement. The military has focused on tangible measures to implement the military agreement, and as a result, efforts and capabilities to build a counter strategies and system to North Korea's nuclear threat have been dispersed. These cases suggest the importance of prudent and rational judgment from the standpoint of national interest on the “proposition” that the military should be subordinated to “political” purposes, and that a strategy is needed to prepare for changes in North-South relations in the long term.

Vol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.