Comparative study of two common methods for the determination of total mercury in soil

Cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry and atomic fluorescence methods were employed to ascertain the total mercury concentration in soil samples. A systematic comparison and analysis were conducted on the operational procedures, precision and detection limits of these methodologies. The standard curve for total mercury determination in soil using the atomic fluorescence method is <i>y</i> = 851.98<i>x</i>+16.771 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9996, 0-2.5 µg l<sup>-1</sup>), with a detection limit of 0.0006 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>. This method demonstrates superior precision and accuracy not only for samples with high and medium concentrations but also for those with low concentrations. For the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method, the standard curve for total mercury determination is <i>y</i> = 0.0547<i>x</i> + 0.0047 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-15 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). For high-concentration samples, the curve is <i>y</i> = 0.0007<i>x</i> - 0.0003 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-600 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). The detection limit for this method is 0.06 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, indicating better sensitivity and accuracy compared with the atomic fluorescence method. While the precision for low-concentration (0.017 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples is moderate, it is higher for medium (0.030 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and high-concentration (0.590 ± 0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples. Overall, there is no significant difference between the two detection methods. However, the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method has the advantage of not requiring pre-treatment, making it more convenient and environment friendly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240757
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of two common methods for the determination of total mercury in soil

Jiali Huang, Ying Guan, Pinzhu Qin, Xiamin Cheng et al.
3 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
3.60
article

Comparative study of two common methods for the determination of total mercury in soil

Jiali Huang, Ying Guan, Pinzhu Qin, Xiamin Cheng, Zhengqing Cai, Bowen Li, Cuilan Wei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry and atomic fluorescence methods were employed to ascertain the total mercury concentration in soil samples. A systematic comparison and analysis were conducted on the operational procedures, precision and detection limits of these methodologies. The standard curve for total mercury determination in soil using the atomic fluorescence method is <i>y</i> = 851.98<i>x</i>+16.771 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9996, 0-2.5 µg l<sup>-1</sup>), with a detection limit of 0.0006 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>. This method demonstrates superior precision and accuracy not only for samples with high and medium concentrations but also for those with low concentrations. For the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method, the standard curve for total mercury determination is <i>y</i> = 0.0547<i>x</i> + 0.0047 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-15 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). For high-concentration samples, the curve is <i>y</i> = 0.0007<i>x</i> - 0.0003 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-600 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). The detection limit for this method is 0.06 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, indicating better sensitivity and accuracy compared with the atomic fluorescence method. While the precision for low-concentration (0.017 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples is moderate, it is higher for medium (0.030 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and high-concentration (0.590 ± 0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples. Overall, there is no significant difference between the two detection methods. However, the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method has the advantage of not requiring pre-treatment, making it more convenient and environment friendly.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(2)
Nanjing Tech University (CN), The Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.