Social vulnerability: A driving force in amplifying the overall vulnerability of protected areas to natural hazards

Incorporating social vulnerability (SoV) into vulnerability assessments for protected areas provides critical insights for enhancing the resilience and adaptability of these regions to environmental hazards. This study aimed to develop and apply an integrated social-ecological vulnerability assessment framework for a forest-protected area, focusing on scales relevant to management decisions. We collected data from 70 villages within the protected area through structured surveys, interviews, and reviews of secondary socio-economic and environmental datasets. A total of 24 socio-economic and environmental indicators were selected, based on expert consultation and literature review, to quantify the indices of exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, and SoV. These indicators were weighted using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to ensure objective and expert-driven prioritization. Subsequently, the SoV index, derived from socio-economic metrics, was incorporated as a key variable in the exposure assessment. This integration involved 18 additional ecological indicators measured across a spatial grid, enabling a fine-scale analysis of the protected area's exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, and overall vulnerability. Integrating social and ecological dimensions allowed for a spatially explicit evaluation of vulnerability at the grid-cell level, providing granular insights for localized management interventions. The results revealed that SoV significantly influenced the levels of exposure and overall vulnerability across the study area. High SoV values corresponded to areas with elevated overall vulnerability, emphasizing the interplay between social conditions and ecological risks. To enhance resilience in the medium and long term, the study recommends shifting investments toward active community engagement in conservation planning, increasing environmental awareness through education programs, and improving the socio-economic well-being of local communities to mitigate social vulnerability. This approach highlights the importance of integrating social dimensions into ecological assessments to inform more equitable and effective management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42617
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social vulnerability: A driving force in amplifying the overall vulnerability of protected areas to natural hazards

Huxiong Li, Saied Pirasteh, Eric K. Zenner, Akram Nouri-Kamari et al.
5 citations
Heliyon
Climate change impacts on agriculture
15.13
article

Social vulnerability: A driving force in amplifying the overall vulnerability of protected areas to natural hazards

Huxiong Li, Saied Pirasteh, Eric K. Zenner, Akram Nouri-Kamari, Tim Frazier, Saman Ghaffarian, Davood Mafi-Gholami, Tao Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Incorporating social vulnerability (SoV) into vulnerability assessments for protected areas provides critical insights for enhancing the resilience and adaptability of these regions to environmental hazards. This study aimed to develop and apply an integrated social-ecological vulnerability assessment framework for a forest-protected area, focusing on scales relevant to management decisions. We collected data from 70 villages within the protected area through structured surveys, interviews, and reviews of secondary socio-economic and environmental datasets. A total of 24 socio-economic and environmental indicators were selected, based on expert consultation and literature review, to quantify the indices of exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, and SoV. These indicators were weighted using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to ensure objective and expert-driven prioritization. Subsequently, the SoV index, derived from socio-economic metrics, was incorporated as a key variable in the exposure assessment. This integration involved 18 additional ecological indicators measured across a spatial grid, enabling a fine-scale analysis of the protected area's exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, and overall vulnerability. Integrating social and ecological dimensions allowed for a spatially explicit evaluation of vulnerability at the grid-cell level, providing granular insights for localized management interventions. The results revealed that SoV significantly influenced the levels of exposure and overall vulnerability across the study area. High SoV values corresponded to areas with elevated overall vulnerability, emphasizing the interplay between social conditions and ecological risks. To enhance resilience in the medium and long term, the study recommends shifting investments toward active community engagement in conservation planning, increasing environmental awareness through education programs, and improving the socio-economic well-being of local communities to mitigate social vulnerability. This approach highlights the importance of integrating social dimensions into ecological assessments to inform more equitable and effective management strategies.

HeliyonVol. 11(4)
Shahrekord University (IR), Pennsylvania State University (US), Georgetown University (US), Shaoxing University (CN), Animal Science Research Institute (CN), Farhangian University (IR), Systemic Risk Centre (GB), University College London (GB), Saveetha University (IN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shaoxing University, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.