B-Trees Are Back: Engineering Fast and Pageable Node Layouts

Large main memory capacity and even larger data sets have motivated hybrid storage systems, which serve most transactions from memory, but can seamlessly transition to flash storage. In such systems, the data structure of choice is usually a B-Tree with pageable nodes. Most academic B-Tree work considers only fixed size records, making them unsuitable for most practical applications. Given the prevalence of B-Trees, surprisingly few available implementations and benchmarks of optimized B-Trees cover variable-sized records. In this paper, we describe an efficient B-Tree implementation supporting variable-sized records containing six known node layout optimizations. We evaluate each optimization to guide future implementations, and propose an optimized adaptive layout that can even compete with pure in-memory structures for many workloads. Our results show that well-engineered B-Trees can efficiently handle both in-memory and out-of-memory workloads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3709664
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B-Trees Are Back: Engineering Fast and Pageable Node Layouts

Viktor Leis, Lawrence Benson, M.W. Müller
3 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
4.46
article

B-Trees Are Back: Engineering Fast and Pageable Node Layouts

Viktor Leis, Lawrence Benson, M.W. Müller
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Large main memory capacity and even larger data sets have motivated hybrid storage systems, which serve most transactions from memory, but can seamlessly transition to flash storage. In such systems, the data structure of choice is usually a B-Tree with pageable nodes. Most academic B-Tree work considers only fixed size records, making them unsuitable for most practical applications. Given the prevalence of B-Trees, surprisingly few available implementations and benchmarks of optimized B-Trees cover variable-sized records. In this paper, we describe an efficient B-Tree implementation supporting variable-sized records containing six known node layout optimizations. We evaluate each optimization to guide future implementations, and propose an optimized adaptive layout that can even compete with pure in-memory structures for many workloads. Our results show that well-engineered B-Trees can efficiently handle both in-memory and out-of-memory workloads.

Proceedings of the ACM on Management of DataVol. 3(1)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.