Phase II Study of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Panitumumab in Patients With <i>KRAS</i> / <i>NRAS</i> / <i>BRAF</i> Wild-Type Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE Panitumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is standard therapy for patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type (WT), microsatellite stable (MSS), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized that the addition of ipilimumab (anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD1) to panitumumab would increase response rate. METHODS This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab in KRAS / NRAS / BRAF WT, MSS mCRC. Eligible patients had received ≥1 previous lines of therapy and no previous anti-EGFR or immune checkpoint inhibitor. Patients received ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV once every 6 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg IV once every 2 weeks, and panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV once every 2 weeks until progression, toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary outcome was overall response rate at 12 weeks. Using a Simon's two-stage design, with null and alternative hypothesis response rates of 22% and 35%, responses in ≥17 patients of 56 would be considered worthy of additional study. RESULTS In 56 patients enrolled between March 2018 and June 2020, the response rate was 32.1% (95% CI, 21.4 to 45.2; n = 18). The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.4), and the median overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.2 to 27.5). With a median follow-up of 43.3 months (95% CI, 41 to 55), four patients (10.7%) were alive without progression, including two patients with liver metastases. There was one treatment-related grade 5 myocarditis. The most common treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included lipase increased (9%), amylase increased (7%), ALT increased (5%), AST increased (5%), diarrhea (5%), hypophosphatemia (5%), and maculopapular rash (5%). CONCLUSION The combination of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab demonstrated an acceptable response rate including a signal of durable response even among patients with liver metastases, suggesting activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-EGFR therapy in MSS mCRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO oncology advances.
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/oa-24-00086
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase II Study of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Panitumumab in Patients With KRAS / NRAS / BRAF Wild-Type Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Tammy Triglianos, Iman Imanirad, Anita Turk, Kristen K. Ciombor et al.
2 citations
JCO oncology advances.
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
2.09
article

Phase II Study of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Panitumumab in Patients With KRAS / NRAS / BRAF Wild-Type Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Tammy Triglianos, Iman Imanirad, Anita Turk, Kristen K. Ciombor, Stacey A. Cohen, Ashwin Somasundaram, Hanna K. Sanoff, Autumn J. McRee, Michael S. Lee, Dominic T. Moore
article en
2 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Panitumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is standard therapy for patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type (WT), microsatellite stable (MSS), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized that the addition of ipilimumab (anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD1) to panitumumab would increase response rate. METHODS This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab in KRAS / NRAS / BRAF WT, MSS mCRC. Eligible patients had received ≥1 previous lines of therapy and no previous anti-EGFR or immune checkpoint inhibitor. Patients received ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV once every 6 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg IV once every 2 weeks, and panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV once every 2 weeks until progression, toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary outcome was overall response rate at 12 weeks. Using a Simon's two-stage design, with null and alternative hypothesis response rates of 22% and 35%, responses in ≥17 patients of 56 would be considered worthy of additional study. RESULTS In 56 patients enrolled between March 2018 and June 2020, the response rate was 32.1% (95% CI, 21.4 to 45.2; n = 18). The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.4), and the median overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.2 to 27.5). With a median follow-up of 43.3 months (95% CI, 41 to 55), four patients (10.7%) were alive without progression, including two patients with liver metastases. There was one treatment-related grade 5 myocarditis. The most common treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included lipase increased (9%), amylase increased (7%), ALT increased (5%), AST increased (5%), diarrhea (5%), hypophosphatemia (5%), and maculopapular rash (5%). CONCLUSION The combination of panitumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab demonstrated an acceptable response rate including a signal of durable response even among patients with liver metastases, suggesting activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-EGFR therapy in MSS mCRC.

JCO oncology advances.(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Indiana University Health (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of Washington (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.