The ‘Sanctuary Gap’: Reviewing the Research on Captive Wildlife Sanctuary Tourism

Wildlife sanctuaries have gained popularity in recent years as settings for research into human-animal relations, captive wildlife tourism, and rehabilitation. While scholars from animal studies, ethics, geography, and ethnography disciplines have turned their attention to sanctuaries, there is still limited engagement from the fields of tourism, conservation, and animal welfare sciences. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this paper addresses the 'sanctuary gap' by offering a synthesis of the existing research related to wildlife sanctuary tourism. To this end, the paper suggests preliminary definitions for <i>wildlife sanctuary tourism</i> and <i>wildlife sanctuary attractions</i>, as well as a typology of sanctuaries along a spectrum from <i>greenwashed</i> to <i>just</i>. It aims to illuminate the shadowy presence of wildlife sanctuaries across multiple disciplines and identify areas for future research. The discussion considers how sanctuaries are well-suited to research on multispecies communities, as well as the conservation and welfare of wild animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040496
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘Sanctuary Gap’: Reviewing the Research on Captive Wildlife Sanctuary Tourism

Siobhan Speiran
5 citations
Animals
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
article

The ‘Sanctuary Gap’: Reviewing the Research on Captive Wildlife Sanctuary Tourism

Siobhan Speiran
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Wildlife sanctuaries have gained popularity in recent years as settings for research into human-animal relations, captive wildlife tourism, and rehabilitation. While scholars from animal studies, ethics, geography, and ethnography disciplines have turned their attention to sanctuaries, there is still limited engagement from the fields of tourism, conservation, and animal welfare sciences. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this paper addresses the 'sanctuary gap' by offering a synthesis of the existing research related to wildlife sanctuary tourism. To this end, the paper suggests preliminary definitions for <i>wildlife sanctuary tourism</i> and <i>wildlife sanctuary attractions</i>, as well as a typology of sanctuaries along a spectrum from <i>greenwashed</i> to <i>just</i>. It aims to illuminate the shadowy presence of wildlife sanctuaries across multiple disciplines and identify areas for future research. The discussion considers how sanctuaries are well-suited to research on multispecies communities, as well as the conservation and welfare of wild animals.

AnimalsVol. 15(4)
York University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ‘Sanctuary Gap’: Reviewing the Research on Captive Wildlife Sanctuary Tourism — Siobhan Speiran · Animals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS