Inequitable Screening for Pregnancy Intention by Race, Insurance, and Site of Care in Two High-Volume Urban Obstetric Hospitals

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In the United States, public health efforts are focused on reducing unintended pregnancy. Yet, differences in rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and unintended births by race are driven by a combination of patient-, health system-, and provider-related factors. Despite this complicated scaffolding underpinning pregnancy intention, patients are often screened for pregnancy intention or planning when they have a positive pregnancy test. We hypothesized screening may vary by patient and health system characteristics. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To identify associations between patient and health system characteristics and receiving screening for pregnancy intention or planning. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of all singleton deliveries in 2019 at two Philadelphia hospitals. Our primary outcome was the presence or absence of pregnancy intention screening by the clinical team. We used logistic regression to determine patient and hospital characteristics associated with screening for pregnancy intention. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 9,672 deliveries, 48% of births were among Black individuals, 91% were non-Hispanic, and 45% had public or no insurance; of all births, 33% were screened for pregnancy intention or planning. Patients were more likely to be asked if their pregnancy was intended if they were: Black (2.38 [2.10-2.750]) or publicly insured or uninsured (2.78 [2.43-3.20]). The hospital site where the patient received care was the primary driver of whether a patient was asked about pregnancy intention (10.59 [9.35-12.0]). After accounting for the hospital sites, patients of Black race remained significantly more likely to be screened than White patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Inequities in pregnancy intention or planning screening were driven by differences in institutional practices and patient race. These findings underscore the need for equitable screening practices that ensure all patients receive high-quality, unbiased, and patient-centered reproductive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2025-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequitable Screening for Pregnancy Intention by Race, Insurance, and Site of Care in Two High-Volume Urban Obstetric Hospitals

Sindhu Kikkeri Srinivas, Alice Abernathy, Jesse Chittams, Markolline Forkpa et al.
1 citations
Journal of Women s Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.88
article

Inequitable Screening for Pregnancy Intention by Race, Insurance, and Site of Care in Two High-Volume Urban Obstetric Hospitals

Sindhu Kikkeri Srinivas, Alice Abernathy, Jesse Chittams, Markolline Forkpa, Sunni L. Mumford, Miatta Goba, Courtney A. Schreiber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In the United States, public health efforts are focused on reducing unintended pregnancy. Yet, differences in rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and unintended births by race are driven by a combination of patient-, health system-, and provider-related factors. Despite this complicated scaffolding underpinning pregnancy intention, patients are often screened for pregnancy intention or planning when they have a positive pregnancy test. We hypothesized screening may vary by patient and health system characteristics. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To identify associations between patient and health system characteristics and receiving screening for pregnancy intention or planning. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of all singleton deliveries in 2019 at two Philadelphia hospitals. Our primary outcome was the presence or absence of pregnancy intention screening by the clinical team. We used logistic regression to determine patient and hospital characteristics associated with screening for pregnancy intention. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 9,672 deliveries, 48% of births were among Black individuals, 91% were non-Hispanic, and 45% had public or no insurance; of all births, 33% were screened for pregnancy intention or planning. Patients were more likely to be asked if their pregnancy was intended if they were: Black (2.38 [2.10-2.750]) or publicly insured or uninsured (2.78 [2.43-3.20]). The hospital site where the patient received care was the primary driver of whether a patient was asked about pregnancy intention (10.59 [9.35-12.0]). After accounting for the hospital sites, patients of Black race remained significantly more likely to be screened than White patients. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Inequities in pregnancy intention or planning screening were driven by differences in institutional practices and patient race. These findings underscore the need for equitable screening practices that ensure all patients receive high-quality, unbiased, and patient-centered reproductive care.

Journal of Women s HealthVol. 34(4)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.