Assessment and driving mechanisms for the supply–demand of ecosystem services in the central plains urban agglomeration, China: A water-soil-food-carbon nexus perspective

• The optimized geographical detector is adopted to analyze the driving mechanisms. • Cities show significant variations in supply–demand distribution and matching. • The obvious trade-offs/synergies exist on both sides of supply and demand. • Interactions between factors dominate the supply–demand balance. To achieve effective ecosystem management and conservation while promoting regional sustainable development, a quantitative assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) supply, demand, and driving mechanisms is essential. Taking the Central Plains urban agglomeration (CPUA) as the study area, we focused on the water-soil-food-carbon nexus (WSFC-Nexus) and quantified the supply and demand of four important ESs: water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS). Additionally, we analyzed the relationship characteristics and assessed the supply–demand matching situations of ESs. On this basis, we integrated various data discretization methods into geographic detectors to address subjective classification limitations, thereby enhancing the accuracy of exploring the ESs supply–demand balance (SDB) mechanisms. Our results indicated that WY and CS exhibited predominantly positive coupling in supply and demand, whereas SC and FP showed primarily negative coupling. Significant synergies were observed on the supply side in WY–FP, WY–CS, and SC–CS, while SC–FP showed a distinct trade-off. Conversely, WY–SC and FP–CS showed no significant correlation. On the demand side, strong synergistic relationships were evident in WY–FP, WY–CS, and FP–CS, while trade-offs were observed in WY–SC, SC–FP, and SC–CS. The supply–demand matching of ESs differed between locations. The northern areas predominantly concentrated deficits in WY, the western regions widely spread deficits in SC and FP, and urban areas primarily observed deficits in CS. The impact of interactions between factors on the SDB of ESs was more significant than that of individual factors. The interaction between precipitation and land-use dominated WY; vegetation and terrain interaction significantly affected SC; and the interaction between vegetation and population substantially impacted FP and CS. This study contributes to clarifying the underlying mechanisms that drive the SDB of ESs and provides a theoretical basis for urban resource management and allocation in CPUA.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113218
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment and driving mechanisms for the supply–demand of ecosystem services in the central plains urban agglomeration, China: A water-soil-food-carbon nexus perspective

Yichen Fang, Lu Zhang, Xinyu Guo, Qi-jie Tang et al.
12 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
13.26
article

Assessment and driving mechanisms for the supply–demand of ecosystem services in the central plains urban agglomeration, China: A water-soil-food-carbon nexus perspective

Yichen Fang, Lu Zhang, Xinyu Guo, Qi-jie Tang, Lianhai Cao
article en
12 citations

Abstract

• The optimized geographical detector is adopted to analyze the driving mechanisms. • Cities show significant variations in supply–demand distribution and matching. • The obvious trade-offs/synergies exist on both sides of supply and demand. • Interactions between factors dominate the supply–demand balance. To achieve effective ecosystem management and conservation while promoting regional sustainable development, a quantitative assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) supply, demand, and driving mechanisms is essential. Taking the Central Plains urban agglomeration (CPUA) as the study area, we focused on the water-soil-food-carbon nexus (WSFC-Nexus) and quantified the supply and demand of four important ESs: water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), food production (FP), and carbon sequestration (CS). Additionally, we analyzed the relationship characteristics and assessed the supply–demand matching situations of ESs. On this basis, we integrated various data discretization methods into geographic detectors to address subjective classification limitations, thereby enhancing the accuracy of exploring the ESs supply–demand balance (SDB) mechanisms. Our results indicated that WY and CS exhibited predominantly positive coupling in supply and demand, whereas SC and FP showed primarily negative coupling. Significant synergies were observed on the supply side in WY–FP, WY–CS, and SC–CS, while SC–FP showed a distinct trade-off. Conversely, WY–SC and FP–CS showed no significant correlation. On the demand side, strong synergistic relationships were evident in WY–FP, WY–CS, and FP–CS, while trade-offs were observed in WY–SC, SC–FP, and SC–CS. The supply–demand matching of ESs differed between locations. The northern areas predominantly concentrated deficits in WY, the western regions widely spread deficits in SC and FP, and urban areas primarily observed deficits in CS. The impact of interactions between factors on the SDB of ESs was more significant than that of individual factors. The interaction between precipitation and land-use dominated WY; vegetation and terrain interaction significantly affected SC; and the interaction between vegetation and population substantially impacted FP and CS. This study contributes to clarifying the underlying mechanisms that drive the SDB of ESs and provides a theoretical basis for urban resource management and allocation in CPUA.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 171
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
13.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.