A Comparative Analysis of On-Device AI-Driven, Self-Regulated Learning and Traditional Pedagogy in University Health Sciences Education

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced transformative paradigms into education, facilitating personalized, real-time, and interactive learning experiences. This study investigates the integration of AI-based textbooks within regular college curricula, with a specific focus on their application in ancillary engineering subjects that demand high precision. AI textbooks enable customized learning pathways, enhance student engagement through adaptive content, and provide educators with data-driven insights. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research compares the academic performance and learning experiences of two groups: the Traditional Learning Group (TLG), which utilized printed materials; and the AI Learning Group (ALG), which employed a generative AI-powered textbook based on LLama 3.1. Over a 15-week semester, data were collected through pre- and post-tests, task evaluations, platform log analyses, and satisfaction surveys. The findings reveal no statistically significant differences between the two groups in quantitative measures such as academic achievement, learning time, and overall satisfaction. However, the qualitative assessments underscore the role of AI-based learning in supporting self-directed education, while also highlighting the critical challenges, including digital equity, algorithmic biases, and data privacy concerns. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the necessity of comprehensive educator training, the establishment of ethical frameworks, and the development of scalable implementation strategies to fully leverage the potential of AI textbooks. Future research should prioritize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the long-term impacts of AI-based educational tools and develop adaptive frameworks that balance technological advancements with the emotional and motivational dimensions of human-centered education. This pioneering research lays the groundwork for advancing generative AI in higher education and fostering an innovative and equitable learning ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041815
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
48.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of On-Device AI-Driven, Self-Regulated Learning and Traditional Pedagogy in University Health Sciences Education

Seoyoon Heo, Y. Barry Chung, C. Kim, Geumgu Lee et al.
14 citations
Applied Sciences
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
48.23
article

A Comparative Analysis of On-Device AI-Driven, Self-Regulated Learning and Traditional Pedagogy in University Health Sciences Education

Seoyoon Heo, Y. Barry Chung, C. Kim, Geumgu Lee, Hyejin Kim, Jongsik Chun, Jeong-Soo Kim, Sug-hoan Cho
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced transformative paradigms into education, facilitating personalized, real-time, and interactive learning experiences. This study investigates the integration of AI-based textbooks within regular college curricula, with a specific focus on their application in ancillary engineering subjects that demand high precision. AI textbooks enable customized learning pathways, enhance student engagement through adaptive content, and provide educators with data-driven insights. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research compares the academic performance and learning experiences of two groups: the Traditional Learning Group (TLG), which utilized printed materials; and the AI Learning Group (ALG), which employed a generative AI-powered textbook based on LLama 3.1. Over a 15-week semester, data were collected through pre- and post-tests, task evaluations, platform log analyses, and satisfaction surveys. The findings reveal no statistically significant differences between the two groups in quantitative measures such as academic achievement, learning time, and overall satisfaction. However, the qualitative assessments underscore the role of AI-based learning in supporting self-directed education, while also highlighting the critical challenges, including digital equity, algorithmic biases, and data privacy concerns. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the necessity of comprehensive educator training, the establishment of ethical frameworks, and the development of scalable implementation strategies to fully leverage the potential of AI textbooks. Future research should prioritize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the long-term impacts of AI-based educational tools and develop adaptive frameworks that balance technological advancements with the emotional and motivational dimensions of human-centered education. This pioneering research lays the groundwork for advancing generative AI in higher education and fostering an innovative and equitable learning ecosystem.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(4)
Kyungbok University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
48.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.