Replication, a Hallmark of Good Science: Unraveling the Factors That Predict Replication Success

Considerable discussion in recent years has focused on failures to replicate findings in the psychological literature.In a Monte Carlo simulation of the research process, we examined several characteristics of research studies that might predict replication success (i.e., when both studies show similar effect sizes), and when estimated effect sizes reflect true effects.In our simulation, a successful replication was most likely when the initial findings had already been replicated once by the original author and when measurement reliability was high.As expected, greater replication success was also associated with narrow confidence intervals around effect-size estimates.However, sample sizes (i.e., those typically found in experimental psychological research) contributed relatively little to replication success.The estimates of true effect sizes were more accurate, aligning closely with the values specified in the simulation, under the same conditions associated with replication success.We discuss our findings in terms of how changes in research practices might produce more reliable psychological research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Quantitative Methods for Psychology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.21.1.p024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replication, a Hallmark of Good Science: Unraveling the Factors That Predict Replication Success

Brent Snook, Cathryn M. Button, Malcolm Grant
1 citations
The Quantitative Methods for Psychology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
article

Replication, a Hallmark of Good Science: Unraveling the Factors That Predict Replication Success

Brent Snook, Cathryn M. Button, Malcolm Grant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Considerable discussion in recent years has focused on failures to replicate findings in the psychological literature.In a Monte Carlo simulation of the research process, we examined several characteristics of research studies that might predict replication success (i.e., when both studies show similar effect sizes), and when estimated effect sizes reflect true effects.In our simulation, a successful replication was most likely when the initial findings had already been replicated once by the original author and when measurement reliability was high.As expected, greater replication success was also associated with narrow confidence intervals around effect-size estimates.However, sample sizes (i.e., those typically found in experimental psychological research) contributed relatively little to replication success.The estimates of true effect sizes were more accurate, aligning closely with the values specified in the simulation, under the same conditions associated with replication success.We discuss our findings in terms of how changes in research practices might produce more reliable psychological research.

The Quantitative Methods for PsychologyVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Replication, a Hallmark of Good Science: Unraveling the Factors That Predict Replication Success — Brent Snook, Cathryn M. Button, et al. · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS