Insights into Beneficial Effects of an Agroforestry System on Soil Properties and Crop Yields: A Case Study from the Experimental Farm at University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Agroforestry systems are sustainable farming practices with multiple benefits like enhanced biodiversity, soil nutrient cycling, soil physical properties, and carbon sequestration. Investigating these multiple beneficial effects of agroforestry systems compared to monoculture cropping systems under diverse pedo-climatic zones and crop-tree combinations is required to gather robust field evidence for agroforestry performance. Hence, the objective was to investigate the beneficial effects of agroforestry systems on soil properties and crop yields in a combined food and energy production (CFE) agroforestry system compared to the conventional winter wheat (CWW) production system in Denmark. The field methods consisted of soil and crop cut sampling, soil moisture measurement, earthworm abundance count in CFE compared to the CWW fields, and climate data for 2023. The study demonstrated that an agroforestry system viz CFEmean and natural forest (NF) had a lower bulk density viz. 1.48 and 1.01 g cm−3, respectively compared to CWW (1.74 g cm−3) with intensive use of fertilizers and chemicals. CFEmean and NF had higher soil organic matter, total nitrogen %, available potassium (K), potentially mineralizable nitrogen, soil moisture retention, and earthworm count under drought conditions compared to CWW. The study demonstrated that alley cropped winter wheat (CFE WW) recorded similar grain yields and significantly higher straw and aboveground biomass accumulation compared to CWW with intensive use of chemical and fertilizer inputs. The biomass belt (BB) effects on alley crop yield varied with the distance with negative effects on grain, straw, and aboveground biomass yields in CFE WW at the nearest points from the BB, and yields increased gradually in the alley fields further away from the BB with maximum grain yields at 62.83 m away from the BB. The study provided a robust field evidence on the beneficial effects of agroforestry on soil properties and crop and biomass yields compared to CWW for informed decision-making by land managers for the adoption of agroforestry practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041466
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights into Beneficial Effects of an Agroforestry System on Soil Properties and Crop Yields: A Case Study from the Experimental Farm at University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, Vaibhav Chaudhary
4 citations
Sustainability
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
25.73
article

Insights into Beneficial Effects of an Agroforestry System on Soil Properties and Crop Yields: A Case Study from the Experimental Farm at University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, Vaibhav Chaudhary
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Agroforestry systems are sustainable farming practices with multiple benefits like enhanced biodiversity, soil nutrient cycling, soil physical properties, and carbon sequestration. Investigating these multiple beneficial effects of agroforestry systems compared to monoculture cropping systems under diverse pedo-climatic zones and crop-tree combinations is required to gather robust field evidence for agroforestry performance. Hence, the objective was to investigate the beneficial effects of agroforestry systems on soil properties and crop yields in a combined food and energy production (CFE) agroforestry system compared to the conventional winter wheat (CWW) production system in Denmark. The field methods consisted of soil and crop cut sampling, soil moisture measurement, earthworm abundance count in CFE compared to the CWW fields, and climate data for 2023. The study demonstrated that an agroforestry system viz CFEmean and natural forest (NF) had a lower bulk density viz. 1.48 and 1.01 g cm−3, respectively compared to CWW (1.74 g cm−3) with intensive use of fertilizers and chemicals. CFEmean and NF had higher soil organic matter, total nitrogen %, available potassium (K), potentially mineralizable nitrogen, soil moisture retention, and earthworm count under drought conditions compared to CWW. The study demonstrated that alley cropped winter wheat (CFE WW) recorded similar grain yields and significantly higher straw and aboveground biomass accumulation compared to CWW with intensive use of chemical and fertilizer inputs. The biomass belt (BB) effects on alley crop yield varied with the distance with negative effects on grain, straw, and aboveground biomass yields in CFE WW at the nearest points from the BB, and yields increased gradually in the alley fields further away from the BB with maximum grain yields at 62.83 m away from the BB. The study provided a robust field evidence on the beneficial effects of agroforestry on soil properties and crop and biomass yields compared to CWW for informed decision-making by land managers for the adoption of agroforestry practice.

SustainabilityVol. 17(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
25.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.