Effect of an intensive antiplaque regimen on microbiome outcomes after nonsurgical periodontal therapy

This study looked at how different treatments for gum disease change the bacteria in the gums of people with moderate to severe gum problems. Eighty-six people received standard gum treatments, and some also used a mouthwash and special tools to clean between their teeth at home. After 6 months, more people in the group that added the extra cleaning steps had healthier bacteria in their gums than people who received the standard treatment. However, not everyone responded the same way. The study found that the types of bacteria someone had at the start were better at predicting how well the treatment would work, more than the type of treatment itself. This means gum disease treatments may need to be personalized for better results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Periodontology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0141
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of an intensive antiplaque regimen on microbiome outcomes after nonsurgical periodontal therapy

Robert J. Genco, Karen L. Falkner, Robert E. Schifferle, Yoshiko Hayashi-Okada et al.
2 citations
Journal of Periodontology
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
2.93
article

Effect of an intensive antiplaque regimen on microbiome outcomes after nonsurgical periodontal therapy

Robert J. Genco, Karen L. Falkner, Robert E. Schifferle, Yoshiko Hayashi-Okada, Keith L. Kirkwood, Yasumitsu Shimizu, Patricia I. Diaz, Lu Li, Joseph J. Zambon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study looked at how different treatments for gum disease change the bacteria in the gums of people with moderate to severe gum problems. Eighty-six people received standard gum treatments, and some also used a mouthwash and special tools to clean between their teeth at home. After 6 months, more people in the group that added the extra cleaning steps had healthier bacteria in their gums than people who received the standard treatment. However, not everyone responded the same way. The study found that the types of bacteria someone had at the start were better at predicting how well the treatment would work, more than the type of treatment itself. This means gum disease treatments may need to be personalized for better results.

Journal of PeriodontologyVol. 96(3)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Sunstar (Japan) (JP), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
2.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.