The Controversy of Indonesian Democracy Practices in The Post-Reform

Democracy in post-reform Indonesia does not always work, and this haseven led to controversy. However, this topic remains underexplored in scholarlydiscussions. In response to gaps in previous studies, this research focuses on thecharacteristics, factors, and controversies of post-reform democracy in Indonesia.Employing a qualitative descriptive approach rooted in case studies, this studyhighlights three key findings. First, the involvement of family members of the rulersas public officials occurs massively in high-state institutions. Second, rulersincreasingly use legal instruments to expand their political influence. Third, therulers widely practice limiting freedom of speech for citizens to maintain the statusquo. This study also recommends the importance of future studies to explaincitizens' perceptions of Indonesia's post-reform democracy by conducting intensiveinterviews. Through this process, it is expected that a more comprehensiveunderstanding of the development of democracy in post-reform Indonesia will begained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1594
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Controversy of Indonesian Democracy Practices in The Post-Reform

Ahmad Yunani, M. Nastain, Irwan Abdullah, Henky Fernando et al.
Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Asian Studies and History
article

The Controversy of Indonesian Democracy Practices in The Post-Reform

Ahmad Yunani, M. Nastain, Irwan Abdullah, Henky Fernando, Yuniar Galuh Larasati, Ismail Ismail, Leanne Morin
article en

Abstract

Democracy in post-reform Indonesia does not always work, and this haseven led to controversy. However, this topic remains underexplored in scholarlydiscussions. In response to gaps in previous studies, this research focuses on thecharacteristics, factors, and controversies of post-reform democracy in Indonesia.Employing a qualitative descriptive approach rooted in case studies, this studyhighlights three key findings. First, the involvement of family members of the rulersas public officials occurs massively in high-state institutions. Second, rulersincreasingly use legal instruments to expand their political influence. Third, therulers widely practice limiting freedom of speech for citizens to maintain the statusquo. This study also recommends the importance of future studies to explaincitizens' perceptions of Indonesia's post-reform democracy by conducting intensiveinterviews. Through this process, it is expected that a more comprehensiveunderstanding of the development of democracy in post-reform Indonesia will begained.

Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial KemasyarakatanVol. 24(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Mercu Buana University (ID), Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi (ID), Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Controversy of Indonesian Democracy Practices in The Post-Reform — Ahmad Yunani, M. Nastain, et al. · Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS