Human Error or Cultural Failure that Cause Serious Incidents and Implications for Industry

People may think that human error means fixing an individual for incidents. This paper clarifies that human error is linked to organisational culture which needs to be fixed, not the individuals. Insufficient training of key employees can lead to a non-precision approach to risk control. Human errors (such as non-judgment, and lack of confidence) can cause serious incidents even in the most advanced technology workplaces or digitalised world. Human errors could be due to cognitive, physical, perceptual and behavioural deficiencies. Every human error can be understood in terms of a sequence of events such as a lack of top management safety culture, cost cutting, and so on. Human errors also show direct and indirect connections with organisational factors, human factors, profit-making attitudes, not keeping the worst in mind while making safety decisions, and not adhering to previous safety recommendations. Temporary repairs and maintenance over time again and again, and not replacing costly parts are greater hidden human issues. Financial implications force companies to carry out temporary repairs but not permanent replacements. Above all, regulatory audits and approvals for faulty repairs increase safety problems even bigger. Maintenance and financial problems heighten the safety issues of companies. Continuing human errors are potential enough to shut down companies, as reviewed in the literature. There could be a possibility of human errors not being identified or resolved with all systems in good condition which is why a particular human error or system error occurred? Whatever is left and whatever is improbable must be the cause of the least understandable incidents. Do companies have a human safety ethics committee that could look into human errors? This paper shares rich qualitative data from seven organisational stories on how they fixed human errors to convert into a positive safety culture towards zero-harm objectives. Vision Zero-harm Interventions are explained to fix human errors, which necessitates that we consider human errors in the antecedents and perspectives of every organisational culture. Don’t fix people, fix cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAMVAD
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53739/samvad/2024/v29/174605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Error or Cultural Failure that Cause Serious Incidents and Implications for Industry

Harbans Lal Kaila
1 citations
SAMVAD
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Human Error or Cultural Failure that Cause Serious Incidents and Implications for Industry

Harbans Lal Kaila
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People may think that human error means fixing an individual for incidents. This paper clarifies that human error is linked to organisational culture which needs to be fixed, not the individuals. Insufficient training of key employees can lead to a non-precision approach to risk control. Human errors (such as non-judgment, and lack of confidence) can cause serious incidents even in the most advanced technology workplaces or digitalised world. Human errors could be due to cognitive, physical, perceptual and behavioural deficiencies. Every human error can be understood in terms of a sequence of events such as a lack of top management safety culture, cost cutting, and so on. Human errors also show direct and indirect connections with organisational factors, human factors, profit-making attitudes, not keeping the worst in mind while making safety decisions, and not adhering to previous safety recommendations. Temporary repairs and maintenance over time again and again, and not replacing costly parts are greater hidden human issues. Financial implications force companies to carry out temporary repairs but not permanent replacements. Above all, regulatory audits and approvals for faulty repairs increase safety problems even bigger. Maintenance and financial problems heighten the safety issues of companies. Continuing human errors are potential enough to shut down companies, as reviewed in the literature. There could be a possibility of human errors not being identified or resolved with all systems in good condition which is why a particular human error or system error occurred? Whatever is left and whatever is improbable must be the cause of the least understandable incidents. Do companies have a human safety ethics committee that could look into human errors? This paper shares rich qualitative data from seven organisational stories on how they fixed human errors to convert into a positive safety culture towards zero-harm objectives. Vision Zero-harm Interventions are explained to fix human errors, which necessitates that we consider human errors in the antecedents and perspectives of every organisational culture. Don’t fix people, fix cultures.

SAMVAD
Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.