Neurophysiological profiles underlying action withholding and action discarding

Although inhibitory control is essential to goal-directed behavior, not all inhibition is the same: Previous research distinguished discarding an action plan from simply withholding it, suggesting separate neurophysiological mechanisms. This study tracks the neurophysiological signatures of both using time-frequency transformation and beamforming in n = 34 healthy individuals. We show that discarding an action plan reduces working memory load, with stronger initial theta band activity compared to withholding it. This oscillatory difference was localized in the (para-)hippocampus and anterior temporal lobe, likely reflecting the need to dissolve action plan features first to enable the following decrease of working memory load. Contrary, when exposed to the embedded stimulus, withholding was associated with higher theta, alpha, and beta band activity relative to discarding. This study advances our understanding of inhibition by revealing distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures involved in withholding versus discarding an action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurophysiological profiles underlying action withholding and action discarding

Wilfried Kunde, Bernhard Pastötter, Roula Jamous, Viola Mocke et al.
1 citations
Cerebral Cortex
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

Neurophysiological profiles underlying action withholding and action discarding

Wilfried Kunde, Bernhard Pastötter, Roula Jamous, Viola Mocke, Christian Beste
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although inhibitory control is essential to goal-directed behavior, not all inhibition is the same: Previous research distinguished discarding an action plan from simply withholding it, suggesting separate neurophysiological mechanisms. This study tracks the neurophysiological signatures of both using time-frequency transformation and beamforming in n = 34 healthy individuals. We show that discarding an action plan reduces working memory load, with stronger initial theta band activity compared to withholding it. This oscillatory difference was localized in the (para-)hippocampus and anterior temporal lobe, likely reflecting the need to dissolve action plan features first to enable the following decrease of working memory load. Contrary, when exposed to the embedded stimulus, withholding was associated with higher theta, alpha, and beta band activity relative to discarding. This study advances our understanding of inhibition by revealing distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures involved in withholding versus discarding an action.

Cerebral CortexVol. 35(2)
University of Würzburg (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neurophysiological profiles underlying action withholding and action discarding — Wilfried Kunde, Bernhard Pastötter, et al. · Cerebral Cortex (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS