Describing learning styles and associated demographic characteristics among university students: Implications for instructional provision in a higher education context

The purpose of this study was to describe students’ learning styles and identify associated demographic characteristics to imply appropriate instructional provisions in a higher education setting. We employed a cross-sectional descriptive survey design. Four universities—Arbaminch, Dilla, Wachamo, and Jinka—were selected from Southern Ethiopia. Three hundred seventeen participants were chosen at random. A learning style (ILS) scale was employed. The finding shows that active, sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles are the major learning styles among students. As in bivariate and multivariate analysis, age was positively associated with reflective, intuitive, verbal, and global learning styles. However, students’ sex, stream, and university were not significantly associated with their learning styles. Generally, looking into the way the learners prefer to learn, and adjusting the instructional provision to fit into their preference is vital. Periodic modification of the instructional provision is also essential as students learning styles change with their age or seniority. Finally, including more demographic and psychosocial variables to examine students’ association with their learning styles is suggested for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kotebe Journal of Education
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61489/30053447.2(2).22
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Describing learning styles and associated demographic characteristics among university students: Implications for instructional provision in a higher education context

Hana Berhanu, Anemut Mehari, Biniam Birru, Bezina Kassahun
2 citations
Kotebe Journal of Education
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
1.58
article

Describing learning styles and associated demographic characteristics among university students: Implications for instructional provision in a higher education context

Hana Berhanu, Anemut Mehari, Biniam Birru, Bezina Kassahun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe students’ learning styles and identify associated demographic characteristics to imply appropriate instructional provisions in a higher education setting. We employed a cross-sectional descriptive survey design. Four universities—Arbaminch, Dilla, Wachamo, and Jinka—were selected from Southern Ethiopia. Three hundred seventeen participants were chosen at random. A learning style (ILS) scale was employed. The finding shows that active, sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles are the major learning styles among students. As in bivariate and multivariate analysis, age was positively associated with reflective, intuitive, verbal, and global learning styles. However, students’ sex, stream, and university were not significantly associated with their learning styles. Generally, looking into the way the learners prefer to learn, and adjusting the instructional provision to fit into their preference is vital. Periodic modification of the instructional provision is also essential as students learning styles change with their age or seniority. Finally, including more demographic and psychosocial variables to examine students’ association with their learning styles is suggested for future research.

Kotebe Journal of EducationVol. 2(2)
Dilla University (ET)
Dilla University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.