Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT): A Preliminary Validation Study

Background: Case-based learning, a clinical reasoning inductive methodology, can be a pedagogical strategy for preclinical medical students. Self-confidence is also an essential issue in this phase of the medical course. Specific tools, such as questionnaires specially designed for this purpose, can better assess the development of these skills. Objective: To validate a questionnaire that assesses preclinical medical students' clinical reasoning accuracy and self-confidence. Methods: We designed the Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT), which was developed and validated to measure accuracy and self-confidence. The target population is the first- and second-year medical students. The questionnaire is compounded by 7 clinical cases of commonly known diseases, with 5 to 6 questions for each case. An expert panel developed the answers’ template. A Likert scale was used to measure self-confidence. CRESCAT was applied in November 2022 to a more advanced sample than the preclinical students: Fourth-year students (4YMS, n=7) and internal medicine medical residents (IMMR, n=7). Statistical analysis included Cronbach’s alpha to determine the reliability of Likert scale answers. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared CRESCAT measures. Spearman’s correlation was applied for the primary objectives. Statistical significance was set at P < .050. Results: We observed an increase in average accuracy from 4YMS to IMMR (65.2±2.9% and 77.7±2.3%, respectively; P= .006). Although there was no difference in self-confidence averages, a moderate correlation was found between self-confidence and accuracy (Rs = .663, P = .001). The validation population considered the CRESCAT friendly and easy to answer. Conclusions: We tested a clinical reasoning and self-confidence assessment tool (CRESCAT) developed for preclinical medical students. It was applied to fourth-year students and medical residents, showing its potential to discriminate accuracy and correlate with self-confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i25734
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT): A Preliminary Validation Study

David Livingstone Alves Figueiredo, Pedro Alejandro GORDAN, Danielle Soraya da Silva Figueiredo, Gustavo Bianchini Porfírio et al.
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT): A Preliminary Validation Study

David Livingstone Alves Figueiredo, Pedro Alejandro GORDAN, Danielle Soraya da Silva Figueiredo, Gustavo Bianchini Porfírio, Leandro Arthur DIEHL, Abrão José Melhem, Felipe Dunin dos Santos, Celso Nilo Didoné Filho
article en

Abstract

Background: Case-based learning, a clinical reasoning inductive methodology, can be a pedagogical strategy for preclinical medical students. Self-confidence is also an essential issue in this phase of the medical course. Specific tools, such as questionnaires specially designed for this purpose, can better assess the development of these skills. Objective: To validate a questionnaire that assesses preclinical medical students' clinical reasoning accuracy and self-confidence. Methods: We designed the Clinical Reasoning and Self-confidence Assessment Tool (CRESCAT), which was developed and validated to measure accuracy and self-confidence. The target population is the first- and second-year medical students. The questionnaire is compounded by 7 clinical cases of commonly known diseases, with 5 to 6 questions for each case. An expert panel developed the answers’ template. A Likert scale was used to measure self-confidence. CRESCAT was applied in November 2022 to a more advanced sample than the preclinical students: Fourth-year students (4YMS, n=7) and internal medicine medical residents (IMMR, n=7). Statistical analysis included Cronbach’s alpha to determine the reliability of Likert scale answers. The Kruskal-Wallis test compared CRESCAT measures. Spearman’s correlation was applied for the primary objectives. Statistical significance was set at P < .050. Results: We observed an increase in average accuracy from 4YMS to IMMR (65.2±2.9% and 77.7±2.3%, respectively; P= .006). Although there was no difference in self-confidence averages, a moderate correlation was found between self-confidence and accuracy (Rs = .663, P = .001). The validation population considered the CRESCAT friendly and easy to answer. Conclusions: We tested a clinical reasoning and self-confidence assessment tool (CRESCAT) developed for preclinical medical students. It was applied to fourth-year students and medical residents, showing its potential to discriminate accuracy and correlate with self-confidence.

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical ResearchVol. 37(2)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Estadual do Paraná (BR), Entomological Society of Brazil (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.