Feasibility and Short-Term Safety of Hydrogel Spacer before Treatment with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer Treatment

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) is a minimally invasive method of ablating prostate cancer (PCa) using ultrasound energy under real-time temperature mapping provided by MRI. Posterior prostate tumors can be challenging to treat with adequate margins because of the proximity of the anterior rectal wall. We report our initial experience with rectal hydrogel spacer (spacer) placement in men undergoing TULSA for PCa treatment. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A small cohort of men with spacers placed before TULSA were analyzed. Spacers were recommended in patients with posterior lesions near the rectal wall. Spacers were placed before TULSA with no other significant modifications during treatment day. Anatomical separation from the spacer was evaluated with <i>ad hoc</i> review of pre-/postspacer placement images. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine patients underwent TULSA with spacers in place, of which two patients had pre-existing spacers in preparation for radiation before switching to TULSA, and seven had intentional spacer placement because of posterior lesions. Spacers resulted in a median separation between the rectal wall and posterior prostate at the index lesion of 6 mm (interquartile range 3-8). All treatments were completed as planned with no additional artifact introduced because of the spacer. No postoperative complications were attributed to the presence of spacer during TULSA. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We demonstrated that TULSA can be safely performed in patients with both polyethylene glycol-based and hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel rectal spacers. The presence of rectal spacer does not appear to impact thermoablation of targeted lesions and enables wider margins during posterior ablations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0700
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Short-Term Safety of Hydrogel Spacer before Treatment with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer Treatment

Yair Lotan, Emily Bochner, Daniel N. Costa, Xiaosong Meng et al.
1 citations
Journal of Endourology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Feasibility and Short-Term Safety of Hydrogel Spacer before Treatment with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer Treatment

Yair Lotan, Emily Bochner, Daniel N. Costa, Xiaosong Meng, Victoria Schulte
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) is a minimally invasive method of ablating prostate cancer (PCa) using ultrasound energy under real-time temperature mapping provided by MRI. Posterior prostate tumors can be challenging to treat with adequate margins because of the proximity of the anterior rectal wall. We report our initial experience with rectal hydrogel spacer (spacer) placement in men undergoing TULSA for PCa treatment. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A small cohort of men with spacers placed before TULSA were analyzed. Spacers were recommended in patients with posterior lesions near the rectal wall. Spacers were placed before TULSA with no other significant modifications during treatment day. Anatomical separation from the spacer was evaluated with <i>ad hoc</i> review of pre-/postspacer placement images. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine patients underwent TULSA with spacers in place, of which two patients had pre-existing spacers in preparation for radiation before switching to TULSA, and seven had intentional spacer placement because of posterior lesions. Spacers resulted in a median separation between the rectal wall and posterior prostate at the index lesion of 6 mm (interquartile range 3-8). All treatments were completed as planned with no additional artifact introduced because of the spacer. No postoperative complications were attributed to the presence of spacer during TULSA. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We demonstrated that TULSA can be safely performed in patients with both polyethylene glycol-based and hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel rectal spacers. The presence of rectal spacer does not appear to impact thermoablation of targeted lesions and enables wider margins during posterior ablations.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 39(4)
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.