Assessment of deep-learning-based resolution recovery algorithm relative to imaging system resolution and feature size
Abstract High-resolution X-ray microscopy is crucial for non-destructive materials characterization, but achieving both high resolution and maintaining a wide field of view often necessitates time-consuming approaches. Deep learning super-resolution methods based on convolutional neural networks are bridging this gap to obtain high-resolution usable data for analysis from low-resolution images. This study evaluates a novel deep learning-based algorithm designed to overcome traditional limitations by learning a spatially varying point spread function from a set of registered low- and high-resolution image pairs. With a systematic methodology, we evaluated the algorithm’s superior performance in recovering features across a wide range of resolutions with increasing image quality degradation. It was also benchmarked against a classical iterative Richardson-Lucy deconvolution algorithm, and a well-known deep-learning-based super-resolution convolutional neural network SRCNN algorithm for the same images. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations using simulated foam phantoms showed that our algorithm shows excellent feature recovery, within 5 % of the ground truth, even for a large resolution ratio of 7:1 between the high- and low-resolution image pairs. Multiscale investigations on real data of porous material and a semiconductor device are also presented to highlight its feature recovery performance and versatility in real-world scenarios.
Authors
- Andriy Andreyev
- V. V. Rohit Bukka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3147-6365)
- Moran Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4091-0629)
- Matthew Andrew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3538-3227)
Institutions
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Carl Zeiss (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Methods in microscopy
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/mim-2024-0017
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.38
Funders
- Oklahoma State University