Impacts of Surface Reconstruction and Metal Dissolution on Ru<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Ti<sub><i>x</i></sub>O<sub>2</sub> Acidic Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts

Improved oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts based on an additional understanding of surface changes that occur upon metal dissolution are needed to enable the efficient use of electrochemical water splitting. This work integrates theoretical and experimental studies of the effects of metal dissolution from the RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>1-<i>x</i></sub> Ti <sub><i>x</i></sub> O<sub>2</sub> surfaces on the OER activity and electrochemical stability. Our computational analysis shows that the energetic barriers for metal dissolution depend highly on the surface site and Ti-substituent location. Metal dissolution induces the formation of new active surface sites with different electronic density distributions. In addition to dissolution-induced changes to the surface composition, electron density changes occur in the interfacial electrolyte components. Surface reconstruction changes the activation barriers for the OER steps. Our experimental analysis of RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> using a two-step durability test in acidic electrolytes shows that the OER activity, surface, and metal dissolution change over the durability tests. Ti-substitution exhibits improved electrochemical stability with cycling. For RuO<sub>2</sub>, changes in the mass activity of RuO<sub>2</sub> with cycling are directly correlated with Ru dissolution and lowering of the electrochemical surface area (ECSA). In contrast, Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> showed a 19 times lower Ru dissolution rate, and metal dissolution results in increasing the ECSA and new active sites. Our STEM and EELS analysis supports that repeated cycling under OER conditions results in surface reconstruction for both RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, with the formation of a disordered RuO<sub>2</sub> surface and changes to the distribution of Ru and Ti at the Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> surface. The experimentally observed changes in activity and surface structure after cycling are consistent with computational analysis, which shows how metal dissolution may alter the OER activation barriers. Combining experimental and computational insights, this work reveals the effects of metal dissolution on the surface atomic and electronic structure and OER activity and advances our comprehension of metal dissolution dynamics and surface reconstruction, which may have implications for other catalytic processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08119
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of Surface Reconstruction and Metal Dissolution on Ru1–xTixO2 Acidic Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts

Francisco Ospina‐Acevedo, Christopher P. Rhodes, Zachary G. Naymik, Perla B. Balbuena et al.
11 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
4.00
article

Impacts of Surface Reconstruction and Metal Dissolution on Ru1–xTixO2 Acidic Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts

Francisco Ospina‐Acevedo, Christopher P. Rhodes, Zachary G. Naymik, Perla B. Balbuena, Kevin C. Matthews, Jamie H. Warner, José Fernando Godínez-Salomón
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Improved oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts based on an additional understanding of surface changes that occur upon metal dissolution are needed to enable the efficient use of electrochemical water splitting. This work integrates theoretical and experimental studies of the effects of metal dissolution from the RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>1-<i>x</i></sub> Ti <sub><i>x</i></sub> O<sub>2</sub> surfaces on the OER activity and electrochemical stability. Our computational analysis shows that the energetic barriers for metal dissolution depend highly on the surface site and Ti-substituent location. Metal dissolution induces the formation of new active surface sites with different electronic density distributions. In addition to dissolution-induced changes to the surface composition, electron density changes occur in the interfacial electrolyte components. Surface reconstruction changes the activation barriers for the OER steps. Our experimental analysis of RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> using a two-step durability test in acidic electrolytes shows that the OER activity, surface, and metal dissolution change over the durability tests. Ti-substitution exhibits improved electrochemical stability with cycling. For RuO<sub>2</sub>, changes in the mass activity of RuO<sub>2</sub> with cycling are directly correlated with Ru dissolution and lowering of the electrochemical surface area (ECSA). In contrast, Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> showed a 19 times lower Ru dissolution rate, and metal dissolution results in increasing the ECSA and new active sites. Our STEM and EELS analysis supports that repeated cycling under OER conditions results in surface reconstruction for both RuO<sub>2</sub> and Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, with the formation of a disordered RuO<sub>2</sub> surface and changes to the distribution of Ru and Ti at the Ru<sub>0.8</sub>Ti<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> surface. The experimentally observed changes in activity and surface structure after cycling are consistent with computational analysis, which shows how metal dissolution may alter the OER activation barriers. Combining experimental and computational insights, this work reveals the effects of metal dissolution on the surface atomic and electronic structure and OER activity and advances our comprehension of metal dissolution dynamics and surface reconstruction, which may have implications for other catalytic processes.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 129(7)
Texas State University (US), Mitchell Institute (US), Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU), Walker (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.