What Do We Think of it So Far? Twenty-Five Years of Devolution

This article reviews twenty-five years of devolution in Scotland with regard to public opinion surveys conducted by the Scottish Centre for Social Research, and funded by Scottish Government. It shows that, despite changes in political party control of Scottish and of British governments, there is consistently higher support for the former over the latter in terms of public trust, capacity to listen, and having a say in how Scotland is governed. Furthermore, over the twenty-five period, credit is disproportionately allocated to Scottish government, and blame to Westminster government, despite the division of constitutional responsibilities between them, as well as the secondary legal status of Holyrood vis-à-vis Westminster. In that regard, Scottish institutions are arguably the beneficiary of powerful notions of ‘sovereignty’ deriving from a theoretical right to self-government even as Scotland remains constitutionally within the United Kingdom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scottish Affairs
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/scot.2025.0533
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Do We Think of it So Far? Twenty-Five Years of Devolution

David McCrone
Scottish Affairs
Political Systems and Governance
article

What Do We Think of it So Far? Twenty-Five Years of Devolution

David McCrone
article en

Abstract

This article reviews twenty-five years of devolution in Scotland with regard to public opinion surveys conducted by the Scottish Centre for Social Research, and funded by Scottish Government. It shows that, despite changes in political party control of Scottish and of British governments, there is consistently higher support for the former over the latter in terms of public trust, capacity to listen, and having a say in how Scotland is governed. Furthermore, over the twenty-five period, credit is disproportionately allocated to Scottish government, and blame to Westminster government, despite the division of constitutional responsibilities between them, as well as the secondary legal status of Holyrood vis-à-vis Westminster. In that regard, Scottish institutions are arguably the beneficiary of powerful notions of ‘sovereignty’ deriving from a theoretical right to self-government even as Scotland remains constitutionally within the United Kingdom.

Scottish AffairsVol. 34(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.