Examining the effects of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on compound action potential in rat sciatic nerve

Aims: Recent interest in Peripheral Regional Blocks (PRB) has increased for surgical and nonsurgical implementations. Lidocaine is frequently preferred in PRBs because of its wide safety margin. The short duration of action limits the use of Lidocaine. Dexmedetomidine is a new-generation adjuvant agent. According to our hypothesis, Dexmedetomidine will prolong the duration of the action of Lidocaine. Methods: A total of 48 rat sciatic nerves were isolated and electrophysiological recordings were taken from 28. They were then randomly divided into 4 groups as Group Control (C), Group L given 1 mM Lidocaine, Group D given 5 microgram/L Dexmedetomidine, and Group LD given 1 mM Lidocaine and 5 microgram/L Dexmedetomidine. Compound Action Potentials (CAP) were recorded after the stimulation of the nerves. Maximum Depolarization Value (MD, mV), time to Maximum Depolarization (MDT), Area Under the CAP curve (Area, mV.ms), and conduction velocities were calculated separately for Fast-Conducting Fibers (CVF, m/s) and Medium-Slow-Conducting Fibers (CVM, m/s). Results: In the comparisons of the Areas Under the Curve, significant differences were detected for Group C and Group LD (P=0.001). In the comparisons of CVF values, significant differences were detected for Group C with Group L and Group LD (p=0.007, p=0.000). In the comparisons of Group L and Group LD (p=0.002). In the comparisons of CVM values, significant differences were detected for Group C with Group L and Group LD (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively). Significant differences were detected between Group L, and Group LD (p=0.009). Conclusion: Results were found showing that perineural Dexmedetomidine when added to Lidocaine as an adjuvant agent, increased the number of fibers that developed block and decreased conduction velocities. These results might indicate that Dexmedetomidine may increase the duration of the block.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51271/eajaic-0024
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the effects of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on compound action potential in rat sciatic nerve

Hatice Toprak, Cemile Öztin Öğün
Eurasian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Examining the effects of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on compound action potential in rat sciatic nerve

Hatice Toprak, Cemile Öztin Öğün
article en

Abstract

Aims: Recent interest in Peripheral Regional Blocks (PRB) has increased for surgical and nonsurgical implementations. Lidocaine is frequently preferred in PRBs because of its wide safety margin. The short duration of action limits the use of Lidocaine. Dexmedetomidine is a new-generation adjuvant agent. According to our hypothesis, Dexmedetomidine will prolong the duration of the action of Lidocaine. Methods: A total of 48 rat sciatic nerves were isolated and electrophysiological recordings were taken from 28. They were then randomly divided into 4 groups as Group Control (C), Group L given 1 mM Lidocaine, Group D given 5 microgram/L Dexmedetomidine, and Group LD given 1 mM Lidocaine and 5 microgram/L Dexmedetomidine. Compound Action Potentials (CAP) were recorded after the stimulation of the nerves. Maximum Depolarization Value (MD, mV), time to Maximum Depolarization (MDT), Area Under the CAP curve (Area, mV.ms), and conduction velocities were calculated separately for Fast-Conducting Fibers (CVF, m/s) and Medium-Slow-Conducting Fibers (CVM, m/s). Results: In the comparisons of the Areas Under the Curve, significant differences were detected for Group C and Group LD (P=0.001). In the comparisons of CVF values, significant differences were detected for Group C with Group L and Group LD (p=0.007, p=0.000). In the comparisons of Group L and Group LD (p=0.002). In the comparisons of CVM values, significant differences were detected for Group C with Group L and Group LD (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively). Significant differences were detected between Group L, and Group LD (p=0.009). Conclusion: Results were found showing that perineural Dexmedetomidine when added to Lidocaine as an adjuvant agent, increased the number of fibers that developed block and decreased conduction velocities. These results might indicate that Dexmedetomidine may increase the duration of the block.

Eurasian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive CareVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.