IS THE DISTAL METATARSAL METAPHYSEAL ANGLE REALLY JUST METATARSAL PRONATION? A WEIGHTBEARING CT ANALYSIS

Aims The distal metatarsal metaphyseal articular angle (DMMA) is a measurement used in the surgical decision making of hallux valgus correction. However, it is difficult to measure on plain radiographs, is subject to projection bias, and its role in pathology is unclear. With the advent of weight-bearing CT (WBCT), our understanding of hallux valgus as a multiplanar deformity has evolved. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the DMAA and pronation of the first metatarsal head in patients with hallux valgus. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective analysis of 50 patients with hallux valgus deformity who had WBCTs obtained as part of routine pre-operative work-up. Patients with metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis, hindfoot deformity and previous surgery were excluded. From the WBCT images digital radiographs were created and the DMMA measured. Measurements were taken by 2 authors, each repeated twice and the average of all four measurements used in analysis. We also measured intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA) and metatarsal pronation angle (MPA). Results There were 41 females and 9 males, mean age 52.4±15.8 years. IMA was 14.5±3.3 degrees, HVA was 29.3±8.4 degrees, MPA was 11.7±6.3 degrees, and DMMA was 15.5±5.3 degrees. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-observer reliability was 0.829 for assessor 1 and 0.910 for assessor 2. ICC for inter-observer reliability was 0.727. Pearsons correlation revealed no link between IMA and DMAA, nor HVA and DMMA. However, there was a significant (albeit small) correlation between MPA and DMMA (r=0.337, p=0.017). Conclusion There was reasonable reliability in measuring DMMA between authors on WBCT. Despite this, DMMA appeared to increase with increasing metatarsal pronation. The DMMA may therefore be (in part) projection artefact secondary to metatarsal pronation and surgeons should be aware of this during surgical planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.1.017
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IS THE DISTAL METATARSAL METAPHYSEAL ANGLE REALLY JUST METATARSAL PRONATION? A WEIGHTBEARING CT ANALYSIS

Karan Malhotra, Matthew Welck, Shelain Patel, Mohammed Shaath et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

IS THE DISTAL METATARSAL METAPHYSEAL ANGLE REALLY JUST METATARSAL PRONATION? A WEIGHTBEARING CT ANALYSIS

Karan Malhotra, Matthew Welck, Shelain Patel, Mohammed Shaath, Nick Cullen, Arvind Vijapur
article en

Abstract

Aims The distal metatarsal metaphyseal articular angle (DMMA) is a measurement used in the surgical decision making of hallux valgus correction. However, it is difficult to measure on plain radiographs, is subject to projection bias, and its role in pathology is unclear. With the advent of weight-bearing CT (WBCT), our understanding of hallux valgus as a multiplanar deformity has evolved. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the DMAA and pronation of the first metatarsal head in patients with hallux valgus. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective analysis of 50 patients with hallux valgus deformity who had WBCTs obtained as part of routine pre-operative work-up. Patients with metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis, hindfoot deformity and previous surgery were excluded. From the WBCT images digital radiographs were created and the DMMA measured. Measurements were taken by 2 authors, each repeated twice and the average of all four measurements used in analysis. We also measured intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA) and metatarsal pronation angle (MPA). Results There were 41 females and 9 males, mean age 52.4±15.8 years. IMA was 14.5±3.3 degrees, HVA was 29.3±8.4 degrees, MPA was 11.7±6.3 degrees, and DMMA was 15.5±5.3 degrees. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-observer reliability was 0.829 for assessor 1 and 0.910 for assessor 2. ICC for inter-observer reliability was 0.727. Pearsons correlation revealed no link between IMA and DMAA, nor HVA and DMMA. However, there was a significant (albeit small) correlation between MPA and DMMA (r=0.337, p=0.017). Conclusion There was reasonable reliability in measuring DMMA between authors on WBCT. Despite this, DMMA appeared to increase with increasing metatarsal pronation. The DMMA may therefore be (in part) projection artefact secondary to metatarsal pronation and surgeons should be aware of this during surgical planning.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_1)
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.