Comparative studies of cross-phase dynamics in turbulent momentum flux and particle flux at the tokamak edge
Abstract Turbulent transport events, including turbulent transport flux of momentum (i.e., turbulent momentum flux or Reynolds stress) and turbulent transport flux of particle (i.e., turbulent particle flux), have important effects on the confinement performance of magnetic confinement fusion devices. Poloidal Reynolds stress is the ensemble average of the product of radial velocity fluctuations and poloidal velocity fluctuations, i.e., $$\langle {\widetilde{v}}_{r}{\widetilde{v}}_{\theta }\rangle$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo>~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo>~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>θ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Turbulent particle flux is the ensemble average of the product of radial velocity fluctuations and density fluctuations, i.e., $$\langle \widetilde{n}{\widetilde{v}}_{r}\rangle$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mo>~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Changes in either amplitude of fluctuations or cross phase between fluctuations can cause changes in turbulent transport. In this paper, cross-phase dynamics in the Reynolds stress and turbulent particle flux at the tokamak edge are studied in detail. Reynolds stress and turbulent particle flux are, respectively, written as the product of fluctuation amplitudes and an average cross-phase factor. The mathematical expressions of the average cross-phase factors are derived. The average cross-phase factors and the power spectra of cross phase are obtained using experimental measurement data. It is found that the cross-phase dynamics in Reynolds stress and particle flux are very different. Reynolds stress is found to be more sensitive to cross phase than particle flux is. In the strong $$E\times B$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> shear layer, spatial slips of cross phase lead to the obvious radial gradient of Reynolds stress. In the no/weak $$E\times B$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> shear region, the cross phase in Reynolds stress tends to lock. Here, phase locking refers to that the power spectra of phase tend to distribute around a fixed phase which does not change with radial position, while phase slip means that the power spectra of cross phase tend to distribute around a phase that varies with radial position. Phase slip or locking mainly describes the central phase weighted by the power spectra, while the phase scattering mainly describes the dispersion of the power spectrum distribution of the phase. The increased scattering of cross phase, which indicates the power spectra distribution of the phase is more dispersed, contributes to the decreased Reynolds stress for higher collisionality. The cross phase in particle flux tends to lock in both strong and no/weak shear regions. The degree of scattering of cross phase in the particle flux does not change obviously as collisionality increases. For higher collisionality, it is the increased density fluctuation amplitude rather than cross-phase dynamics that leads to the increased particle flux. The underlying physical mechanism that causes Reynolds stress and particle flux to exhibit different phase dynamics is discussed.
Authors
- R. Hong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4750-8015)
- Wei Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8018-4529)
- Zhanhui Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0167-9559)
- W.L. Zhong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-9400)
- Guoliang Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7475-7098)
- Jiquan Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-8814)
- Rui Ke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-0098)
- P. H. Diamond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3273-2604)
- Min Xu
- Wenjing Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-8050)
- Guangzhou Hao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-6134)
- Bo Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-8253)
- Ting Long (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-8953)
- L. Nie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-4518)
- Zhe Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9084-8227)
- Zhongbing Shi
- Yongkang Zhou
Institutions
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Southwestern Institute of Physics (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s41614-025-00180-z
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.61
Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
- Jiangsu Development and Reform Commission
- Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province
- Office of Science
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Chengdu Science and Technology Program
- Division of Mathematical Sciences
- Fusion Energy Sciences