Stakeholder analysis of tobacco control policy in Iran: a qualitative study

Tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries is a complex issue due to powerful economic and political bodies in the production and distribution of tobacco products. The urgent need for effective tobacco control measures is highlighted by the rising health burden associated with tobacco use in Iran, necessitating a comprehensive stakeholder analysis. The current study aimed to analyze the roles and characteristics of all stakeholders involved in tobacco control policymaking in Iran. Adhering to the theoretical framework introduced by Varvasovsky and Brugha, a qualitative stakeholder analysis was conducted based on five items of stakeholders’ roles, interests, positions, powers and influences. The actors included in the study encompassed governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the tobacco industry, health organizations, and the international community. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 36 key informants. MAXQDA V.10 software was used to analyze interviews by content analysis, and PolicyMaker software V.4 was used to perform data analysis. Forty-two tobacco-related stakeholders were identified and classified into eight groups of governmental executives, legislative body, non-governmental organizations, mass media, universities, clerics and imitators, the tobacco industry, and international organizations. The Iranian Parliament and public sector stakeholders have the central role in all stages of the policymaking process. The state actors prevail in all stages of Iran’s tobacco control policymaking. The number of non-governmental organizations active in the field of tobacco control was limited. Notably, there exists a conflict of interest between the actors in the two areas of tobacco control and the tobacco industry. Health-related organizations in Iran exhibit a weak coalition for tobacco control, lacking influence over the tobacco industry and smuggling control actors, while various stakeholders have diverse interests impacting their relationships. Strengthening the government’s tobacco control capacity and developing a national tobacco control strategy, in which intersectoral collaboration between different actors is established, can reduce the conflict of interests between involved actors in Iran. This, in turn, leads to a reduction in the smoking rate and an improvement in public health in Iran.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Social Science and Health
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-025-00164-x
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder analysis of tobacco control policy in Iran: a qualitative study

Jalal Arabloo, Mohammad Hajizadeh, Neda Kabiri, Rahim Khodayari‐Zarnaq et al.
Discover Social Science and Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Stakeholder analysis of tobacco control policy in Iran: a qualitative study

Jalal Arabloo, Mohammad Hajizadeh, Neda Kabiri, Rahim Khodayari‐Zarnaq, Azita Pishgoo, Sogand Tourani, Hamid Ravaghi
article en

Abstract

Tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries is a complex issue due to powerful economic and political bodies in the production and distribution of tobacco products. The urgent need for effective tobacco control measures is highlighted by the rising health burden associated with tobacco use in Iran, necessitating a comprehensive stakeholder analysis. The current study aimed to analyze the roles and characteristics of all stakeholders involved in tobacco control policymaking in Iran. Adhering to the theoretical framework introduced by Varvasovsky and Brugha, a qualitative stakeholder analysis was conducted based on five items of stakeholders’ roles, interests, positions, powers and influences. The actors included in the study encompassed governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the tobacco industry, health organizations, and the international community. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 36 key informants. MAXQDA V.10 software was used to analyze interviews by content analysis, and PolicyMaker software V.4 was used to perform data analysis. Forty-two tobacco-related stakeholders were identified and classified into eight groups of governmental executives, legislative body, non-governmental organizations, mass media, universities, clerics and imitators, the tobacco industry, and international organizations. The Iranian Parliament and public sector stakeholders have the central role in all stages of the policymaking process. The state actors prevail in all stages of Iran’s tobacco control policymaking. The number of non-governmental organizations active in the field of tobacco control was limited. Notably, there exists a conflict of interest between the actors in the two areas of tobacco control and the tobacco industry. Health-related organizations in Iran exhibit a weak coalition for tobacco control, lacking influence over the tobacco industry and smuggling control actors, while various stakeholders have diverse interests impacting their relationships. Strengthening the government’s tobacco control capacity and developing a national tobacco control strategy, in which intersectoral collaboration between different actors is established, can reduce the conflict of interests between involved actors in Iran. This, in turn, leads to a reduction in the smoking rate and an improvement in public health in Iran.

Discover Social Science and HealthVol. 5(1)
Dalhousie University (CA), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.