Ranking Departments based on research quality: a statistical evaluation of the ISPD indicator

Abstract Given the relevance of performance-based funding for the Italian University System, in this paper, we analyse the statistical properties of the ISPD indicator used to provide a ranking of the best 180 Italian Departments. Besides the adoption of a standardization procedure and subsequent aggregation, the main flow of the ISPD indicator appears to be its tendency to polarization, which has important consequences on the ability of such indicator to effectively discriminate between outstanding Departments as opposed to those just above the average. Implications on funding allocation are discussed using data on the 2011-2014 Italian research assessment exercise and some proposals on alternative indicators that solve some of the critical aspects of ISPD are sketched.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientometrics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05240-2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking Departments based on research quality: a statistical evaluation of the ISPD indicator

Federica Galli, Fedele Greco
Scientometrics
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Ranking Departments based on research quality: a statistical evaluation of the ISPD indicator

Federica Galli, Fedele Greco
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given the relevance of performance-based funding for the Italian University System, in this paper, we analyse the statistical properties of the ISPD indicator used to provide a ranking of the best 180 Italian Departments. Besides the adoption of a standardization procedure and subsequent aggregation, the main flow of the ISPD indicator appears to be its tendency to polarization, which has important consequences on the ability of such indicator to effectively discriminate between outstanding Departments as opposed to those just above the average. Implications on funding allocation are discussed using data on the 2011-2014 Italian research assessment exercise and some proposals on alternative indicators that solve some of the critical aspects of ISPD are sketched.

ScientometricsVol. 130(2)
University of Bologna (IT)
Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.