Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients

The neural mechanisms underlying time perception remain elusive. Although the cerebellum (CE) and basal ganglia (BG) are considered fundamental, evidence primarily stems from studies on neurodegenerative diseases, where progressive and widespread damage complicates linking deficits to specific brain structures. In contrast, brain stroke affects focal areas suddenly, allowing for the assessment of immediate functional consequences. Here, we compared patients with acute stroke in the CE and BG to age-matched healthy controls (HC) on both explicit (time bisection, free and 1-second finger tapping) and implicit (rhythmic, temporal orienting) timing tasks. Concerning explicit timing, both CE and BG patients were faster than HC in their free finger tapping, while BG lesions showed greater variability than HC in the 1-second tapping. Similarly, performance on the bisection task suggested deficits more related to cognitive complaints in stroke than specific temporal dysfunction. In implicit timing tasks, BG patients, like HC, effectively used information provided by the rhythm and the temporal orienting cues to anticipate the target onset, whereas CE patients failed and showed longer reaction times. Therefore, before compensatory mechanisms can take effect, acute CE damage might hinder implicit timing, whereas BG lesions could disrupt explicit temporal representation when processed alongside other cognitive functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89311-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients

Zaira Romeo, Maura Pugliatti, Giovanna Mioni, Mariagrazia Capizzi et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
article

Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients

Zaira Romeo, Maura Pugliatti, Giovanna Mioni, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Pietro Antenucci, Emanuela Maria Raho, Antonino Visalli, Annibale Antonioni, Daniela Gragnaniello, Andrea Gozzi, Enrico Casadei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying time perception remain elusive. Although the cerebellum (CE) and basal ganglia (BG) are considered fundamental, evidence primarily stems from studies on neurodegenerative diseases, where progressive and widespread damage complicates linking deficits to specific brain structures. In contrast, brain stroke affects focal areas suddenly, allowing for the assessment of immediate functional consequences. Here, we compared patients with acute stroke in the CE and BG to age-matched healthy controls (HC) on both explicit (time bisection, free and 1-second finger tapping) and implicit (rhythmic, temporal orienting) timing tasks. Concerning explicit timing, both CE and BG patients were faster than HC in their free finger tapping, while BG lesions showed greater variability than HC in the 1-second tapping. Similarly, performance on the bisection task suggested deficits more related to cognitive complaints in stroke than specific temporal dysfunction. In implicit timing tasks, BG patients, like HC, effectively used information provided by the rhythm and the temporal orienting cues to anticipate the target onset, whereas CE patients failed and showed longer reaction times. Therefore, before compensatory mechanisms can take effect, acute CE damage might hinder implicit timing, whereas BG lesions could disrupt explicit temporal representation when processed alongside other cognitive functions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Padua (IT), Universidad de Granada (ES), University of Ferrara (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Neuroscience Institute (IT), National Research Council (IT)
European Commission, Universidad de Granada, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.