Quantifying Resilience in Single-Host/Single-Virus Infections

Due to theoretical and practical applications in biomedical, environmental, and industrial microbiology, robust metrics for quantifying the virulence of pathogens is vital. For many virus–host systems, multiple virus strains propagate through host populations. Each strain may exhibit a different virulence level. Likewise, different hosts may manifest different levels of host resilience to infection by a given virus. Recent publications have assessed metrics for quantifying virulence (VR) from growth curve data. Regardless of the metric used, a feature that most methods have in common is focus on the exponential growth phase of virus–host interactions. Often ignored is mortality phase. Following a report introducing the Stacy–Ceballos Inhibition Index (ISC), a robust metric to quantify relative virulence (VR) between viruses, we have turned attention to quantifying relative resilience (RR) between hosts in single-virus/single-host (SVSH) experimental infections. Although resilience during viral infection impacts the entire host growth curve, RR has particular biological significance during the mortality phase. In this report, we argue that calculating RR using a modified ISC provides a robust metric for comparisons between SVSH infections. Wet lab data from fusellovirus infections in Sulfolobales, bacteriophage infections in Mycobacteriales, and simulated infected-host growth profiles form the basis for developing this metric, RR, for quantifying resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Microbiology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol5010018
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Resilience in Single-Host/Single-Virus Infections

Sobroney Heng, Ruth Plymale, Ruben Michael Ceballos, Andrew J. Pierce et al.
Applied Microbiology
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
article

Quantifying Resilience in Single-Host/Single-Virus Infections

Sobroney Heng, Ruth Plymale, Ruben Michael Ceballos, Andrew J. Pierce, Socheata Hour
article en

Abstract

Due to theoretical and practical applications in biomedical, environmental, and industrial microbiology, robust metrics for quantifying the virulence of pathogens is vital. For many virus–host systems, multiple virus strains propagate through host populations. Each strain may exhibit a different virulence level. Likewise, different hosts may manifest different levels of host resilience to infection by a given virus. Recent publications have assessed metrics for quantifying virulence (VR) from growth curve data. Regardless of the metric used, a feature that most methods have in common is focus on the exponential growth phase of virus–host interactions. Often ignored is mortality phase. Following a report introducing the Stacy–Ceballos Inhibition Index (ISC), a robust metric to quantify relative virulence (VR) between viruses, we have turned attention to quantifying relative resilience (RR) between hosts in single-virus/single-host (SVSH) experimental infections. Although resilience during viral infection impacts the entire host growth curve, RR has particular biological significance during the mortality phase. In this report, we argue that calculating RR using a modified ISC provides a robust metric for comparisons between SVSH infections. Wet lab data from fusellovirus infections in Sulfolobales, bacteriophage infections in Mycobacteriales, and simulated infected-host growth profiles form the basis for developing this metric, RR, for quantifying resilience.

Applied MicrobiologyVol. 5(1)
University of California, Merced (US), Ouachita Baptist University (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Biological Infrastructure
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.