Assessment of CatBoost for Diabetes Prevention in Comparison to XGBoost: AI model capable of predicting the onset of diabetes

The metabolic disease known as diabetes is defined by consistently elevated blood sugar levels. An increase in hunger, thirst, and urine production are symptoms of high blood sugar. Untreated diabetes may lead to a variety of complications. Acute complications of diabetes include hyperosmolarity, hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and perhaps death. The most devastating long-term effects are cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, chronic kidney disease, foot ulcers, and vision loss. The World Diabetes Organization estimates that 463 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2019. This population will increase by 578 million by 2030 and by 700 million by 2045, if forecasts pan out. The ability to quickly and accurately diagnose sickness is one of its current medical uses. Therefore, we might potentially reduce death rates via the use of machine learning by creating an AI model that can anticipate when diabetes will start. We will compare the CatBoost and XGBoost algorithms to find the one that is most suited for this purpose. Finally, using a number of health markers from the dataset, the study contrasted XGBoost and CatBoost, two models that may predict diabetes. We train and build our recommended system using Python on a real-world dataset taken from Kaggle. We evaluate our algorithms using precision, recall, F1score, and accuracy metrics, among other performance evaluation parameters. While XGBoost achieved an F1 Score of 91.75, an accuracy rate of 93.33%, a precision of 90.38%, and a recall of 90.63%. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for CatBoost are 96.09%, 93.38%, 91.38% and 92.13%, respectively. It's the most effective ensemble method, according to CatBoost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5880
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of CatBoost for Diabetes Prevention in Comparison to XGBoost: AI model capable of predicting the onset of diabetes

Jeyraj Selvaraj, K Senthil, G. Gifta Jerith, R. Karthikeyan
3 citations
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
8.81
article

Assessment of CatBoost for Diabetes Prevention in Comparison to XGBoost: AI model capable of predicting the onset of diabetes

Jeyraj Selvaraj, K Senthil, G. Gifta Jerith, R. Karthikeyan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The metabolic disease known as diabetes is defined by consistently elevated blood sugar levels. An increase in hunger, thirst, and urine production are symptoms of high blood sugar. Untreated diabetes may lead to a variety of complications. Acute complications of diabetes include hyperosmolarity, hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and perhaps death. The most devastating long-term effects are cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, chronic kidney disease, foot ulcers, and vision loss. The World Diabetes Organization estimates that 463 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2019. This population will increase by 578 million by 2030 and by 700 million by 2045, if forecasts pan out. The ability to quickly and accurately diagnose sickness is one of its current medical uses. Therefore, we might potentially reduce death rates via the use of machine learning by creating an AI model that can anticipate when diabetes will start. We will compare the CatBoost and XGBoost algorithms to find the one that is most suited for this purpose. Finally, using a number of health markers from the dataset, the study contrasted XGBoost and CatBoost, two models that may predict diabetes. We train and build our recommended system using Python on a real-world dataset taken from Kaggle. We evaluate our algorithms using precision, recall, F1score, and accuracy metrics, among other performance evaluation parameters. While XGBoost achieved an F1 Score of 91.75, an accuracy rate of 93.33%, a precision of 90.38%, and a recall of 90.63%. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for CatBoost are 96.09%, 93.38%, 91.38% and 92.13%, respectively. It's the most effective ensemble method, according to CatBoost.

EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of ThingsVol. 11
Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
8.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of CatBoost for Diabetes Prevention in Comparison to XGBoost: AI model capable of predicting the onset of diabetes — Jeyraj Selvaraj, K Senthil, et al. · EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS