Gender differences in board members’ perceptions of governance: a study of four European HE systems

This study focuses on gender differences in the boards of higher education institutions (HEIs), challenging the notion of inherent differences between men and women in board governance. The article provides a gendered analysis of the perceptions of men and women board members about board governance in Finland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden. Contrary to expectations of diverse perceptions, a survey across these countries’ higher education systems revealed that men and women on boards generally shared similar perspectives on board governance. Factors such as professional background, age, and country context proved more significant than gender. The study indicated nuanced differences between men and women board members, such as women exhibiting a more managerialist mindset and emphasizing sustainability. This research contributes to discussions about gender diversity in board governance, extending the exploration to the unique context of European HEIs. The findings provide insights of (gender) diversity and homogeneity of board members and discusses the possible reasons for the homogeneity. For decision-makers and practitioners these insights provide a starting point to shape gender diversity policies for HEIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Higher Education
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2025.2460166
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender differences in board members’ perceptions of governance: a study of four European HE systems

Marta Jaworska, Stefan Lundborg, Marjukka Mikkonen, Gergely Kováts et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Higher Education
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
article

Gender differences in board members’ perceptions of governance: a study of four European HE systems

Marta Jaworska, Stefan Lundborg, Marjukka Mikkonen, Gergely Kováts, Elias Pekkola, Dominik Antonowicz, Pedro Videira, Gabriella Keczer, Teresa Carvalho, Luiz Henrique Alonso de Andrade, Lars Geschwind
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study focuses on gender differences in the boards of higher education institutions (HEIs), challenging the notion of inherent differences between men and women in board governance. The article provides a gendered analysis of the perceptions of men and women board members about board governance in Finland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden. Contrary to expectations of diverse perceptions, a survey across these countries’ higher education systems revealed that men and women on boards generally shared similar perspectives on board governance. Factors such as professional background, age, and country context proved more significant than gender. The study indicated nuanced differences between men and women board members, such as women exhibiting a more managerialist mindset and emphasizing sustainability. This research contributes to discussions about gender diversity in board governance, extending the exploration to the unique context of European HEIs. The findings provide insights of (gender) diversity and homogeneity of board members and discusses the possible reasons for the homogeneity. For decision-makers and practitioners these insights provide a starting point to shape gender diversity policies for HEIs.

European Journal of Higher EducationVol. 16(1)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Tampere University (FI), University of Szeged (HU), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), University of Aveiro (PT), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.