A better way to track hazardous inventories

For chemists who track inventory of laboratory chemicals, radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags can reveal which chemicals are in a storage space much quicker than keeping track of inventory with traditional labels or using bar codes. And because RFID readers don’t require a line of sight to their target, the tags allow scientists to track dangerous chemicals from a distance without direct interaction. You can simply point a reader in the direction of several RFID-tagged chemical containers and quickly know what’s present, says Raul Baez Lara Jr., a performance measurement specialist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). But RFID tagging often isn’t compatible with metal chemical containers, which have limited RFID adoption because metal can interfere with a tag’s radio signal. This particularly affects labs like LLNL that work with hazardous radioactive materials, light-sensitive photographic chemicals, pressurized gases, and oily liquids, which are often kept in metal containers. In a new

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10303-scicon3
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A better way to track hazardous inventories

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
C&EN Global Enterprise
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

A better way to track hazardous inventories

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
article en

Abstract

For chemists who track inventory of laboratory chemicals, radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags can reveal which chemicals are in a storage space much quicker than keeping track of inventory with traditional labels or using bar codes. And because RFID readers don’t require a line of sight to their target, the tags allow scientists to track dangerous chemicals from a distance without direct interaction. You can simply point a reader in the direction of several RFID-tagged chemical containers and quickly know what’s present, says Raul Baez Lara Jr., a performance measurement specialist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). But RFID tagging often isn’t compatible with metal chemical containers, which have limited RFID adoption because metal can interfere with a tag’s radio signal. This particularly affects labs like LLNL that work with hazardous radioactive materials, light-sensitive photographic chemicals, pressurized gases, and oily liquids, which are often kept in metal containers. In a new

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 103(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.