NIH silent as White House targets grants

When the Donald J. Trump administration named Matthew Memoli acting director of the National Institutes of Health on Jan. 24, researchers asked on social media whether Memoli would stop disruptions in both intramural funding and the grant review process. By the time the NIH announced a partial answer to that question, it was superseded by concerns about whether NIH would fund ongoing research in light of a federal order to stop all grant payments. Although that order was rescinded , researchers’ worries have persisted, and they have more questions than official answers from the NIH. After a Jan. 22 communications freeze across the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), NIH researchers and administrators were forbidden from communicating with the public . Study sections —external expert reviews key in directing research funding—were canceled with little notice, which alarmed many scientists. In a Jan. 27 email, an NIH representative told

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10303-leadcon
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIH silent as White House targets grants

Laurel Oldach
C&EN Global Enterprise
Science, Research, and Medicine
article

NIH silent as White House targets grants

Laurel Oldach
article en

Abstract

When the Donald J. Trump administration named Matthew Memoli acting director of the National Institutes of Health on Jan. 24, researchers asked on social media whether Memoli would stop disruptions in both intramural funding and the grant review process. By the time the NIH announced a partial answer to that question, it was superseded by concerns about whether NIH would fund ongoing research in light of a federal order to stop all grant payments. Although that order was rescinded , researchers’ worries have persisted, and they have more questions than official answers from the NIH. After a Jan. 22 communications freeze across the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), NIH researchers and administrators were forbidden from communicating with the public . Study sections —external expert reviews key in directing research funding—were canceled with little notice, which alarmed many scientists. In a Jan. 27 email, an NIH representative told

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 103(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Science, Research, and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.