Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hyperbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in parameter estimation

We present a surrogate numerical-relativity model for close hyperbolic black-hole encounters with equal masses and spins aligned with the orbital momentum. Our model, generated in terms of the Newman–Penrose scalar <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>ψ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>4</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>, spans impact parameters <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mo>/</c:mo><c:mi>M</c:mi><c:mo>∈</c:mo><c:mo stretchy="false">[</c:mo><c:mn>11</c:mn><c:mo>,</c:mo><c:mn>15</c:mn><c:mo stretchy="false">]</c:mo></c:math> and spin components <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>χ</g:mi><g:mi>i</g:mi></g:msub><g:mo>∈</g:mo><g:mo stretchy="false">[</g:mo><g:mo>−</g:mo><g:mn>0.5</g:mn><g:mo>,</g:mo><g:mn>0.5</g:mn><g:mo stretchy="false">]</g:mo></g:math>, modeling the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mo>ℓ</k:mo><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo><k:mo>=</k:mo><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>2</k:mn><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mn>0</k:mn><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo></k:math>, <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>2</q:mn><q:mo>,</q:mo><q:mo>±</q:mo><q:mn>2</q:mn><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo></q:math>, <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mo stretchy="false">(</u:mo><u:mn>3</u:mn><u:mo>,</u:mo><u:mo>±</u:mo><u:mn>2</u:mn><u:mo stretchy="false">)</u:mo></u:math>, and <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mo stretchy="false">(</y:mo><y:mn>4</y:mn><y:mo>,</y:mo><y:mo>±</y:mo><y:mn>4</y:mn><y:mo stretchy="false">)</y:mo></y:math> emission multipoles. The model is faithful to numerical-relativity simulations, yielding mismatches lower than <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msup><cb:mn>10</cb:mn><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo><cb:mn>3</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:math>. We test the ability of our model to recover the parameters of numerically simulated signals. We find that, despite the high accuracy of the model, parameter inference struggles to correctly capture the parameters of the source even for SNRs as large as 50 due to the strong degeneracies present in the parameter space. This indicates that correctly identifying these systems will require extremely large signal loudness, which is only typical of third generation detectors. Nevertheless, we also find that, if one attempts to infer certain combinations of such degenerated parameters, there might be a chance to prove the existence of this type of event, even with the current ground-based detectors, as long as these combinations make sense astrophysically and cosmologically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.044024
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hyperbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in parameter estimation

J. García-Bellido, Raimon Luna, Tomás Andrade, Germán López Izquierdo et al.
15 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
17.32
article

Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hyperbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in parameter estimation

J. García-Bellido, Raimon Luna, Tomás Andrade, Germán López Izquierdo, Santiago Jaraba, J. Calderón Bustillo, Gonzalo Morrás, Joan Fontbuté
article en
15 citations

Abstract

We present a surrogate numerical-relativity model for close hyperbolic black-hole encounters with equal masses and spins aligned with the orbital momentum. Our model, generated in terms of the Newman–Penrose scalar <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>ψ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>4</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>, spans impact parameters <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>b</c:mi><c:mo>/</c:mo><c:mi>M</c:mi><c:mo>∈</c:mo><c:mo stretchy="false">[</c:mo><c:mn>11</c:mn><c:mo>,</c:mo><c:mn>15</c:mn><c:mo stretchy="false">]</c:mo></c:math> and spin components <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>χ</g:mi><g:mi>i</g:mi></g:msub><g:mo>∈</g:mo><g:mo stretchy="false">[</g:mo><g:mo>−</g:mo><g:mn>0.5</g:mn><g:mo>,</g:mo><g:mn>0.5</g:mn><g:mo stretchy="false">]</g:mo></g:math>, modeling the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mo>ℓ</k:mo><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo><k:mo>=</k:mo><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>2</k:mn><k:mo>,</k:mo><k:mn>0</k:mn><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo></k:math>, <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mo stretchy="false">(</q:mo><q:mn>2</q:mn><q:mo>,</q:mo><q:mo>±</q:mo><q:mn>2</q:mn><q:mo stretchy="false">)</q:mo></q:math>, <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mo stretchy="false">(</u:mo><u:mn>3</u:mn><u:mo>,</u:mo><u:mo>±</u:mo><u:mn>2</u:mn><u:mo stretchy="false">)</u:mo></u:math>, and <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mo stretchy="false">(</y:mo><y:mn>4</y:mn><y:mo>,</y:mo><y:mo>±</y:mo><y:mn>4</y:mn><y:mo stretchy="false">)</y:mo></y:math> emission multipoles. The model is faithful to numerical-relativity simulations, yielding mismatches lower than <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msup><cb:mn>10</cb:mn><cb:mrow><cb:mo>−</cb:mo><cb:mn>3</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:math>. We test the ability of our model to recover the parameters of numerically simulated signals. We find that, despite the high accuracy of the model, parameter inference struggles to correctly capture the parameters of the source even for SNRs as large as 50 due to the strong degeneracies present in the parameter space. This indicates that correctly identifying these systems will require extremely large signal loudness, which is only typical of third generation detectors. Nevertheless, we also find that, if one attempts to infer certain combinations of such degenerated parameters, there might be a chance to prove the existence of this type of event, even with the current ground-based detectors, as long as these combinations make sense astrophysically and cosmologically.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(4)
Universitat de València (ES), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Institut Català de Ciències del Clima (ES), Instituto de Física Teórica (ES), Institut de Ciències del Cosmos (ES), University of Aveiro (PT), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
National Science Foundation, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, “la Caixa” Foundation, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, European Commission, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Generalitat Valenciana, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications, Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund, H2020 European Research Council, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
17.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.