Claims to universal norms and the forging of transnational networks: Struggles over the meaning of gender-based and sexual violence in conflicts

Abstract The article analyzes the ways in which claims to universal norms promote, or complicate, collaboration in the context of transnational activism. It emphasizes the potential of a constructivist understanding of universality, i.e. not as something intrinsic to certain norms, but rather as an empirically powerful assumption and a strategic tool. The argumentation is based on two case studies. The first looks at how networks of transnational solidarity were formed and conflicts between activist groups emerged in response to conflict-related sexual violence committed during the Bosnian War. The second example looks at responses to the crimes committed by ISIS in Iraq in 2014 and beyond, demonstrating how shifts within the field of transitional justice, and in particular the emergence of norms centered on the concerns and participation of survivors, have shaped the building of networks around the right to reparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-024-00138-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Claims to universal norms and the forging of transnational networks: Struggles over the meaning of gender-based and sexual violence in conflicts

Daniel Ståhl, Michaela Zöhrer, Christian Methfessel
3 citations
Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
Gender, Security, and Conflict
2.79
article

Claims to universal norms and the forging of transnational networks: Struggles over the meaning of gender-based and sexual violence in conflicts

Daniel Ståhl, Michaela Zöhrer, Christian Methfessel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article analyzes the ways in which claims to universal norms promote, or complicate, collaboration in the context of transnational activism. It emphasizes the potential of a constructivist understanding of universality, i.e. not as something intrinsic to certain norms, but rather as an empirically powerful assumption and a strategic tool. The argumentation is based on two case studies. The first looks at how networks of transnational solidarity were formed and conflicts between activist groups emerged in response to conflict-related sexual violence committed during the Bosnian War. The second example looks at responses to the crimes committed by ISIS in Iraq in 2014 and beyond, demonstrating how shifts within the field of transitional justice, and in particular the emergence of norms centered on the concerns and participation of survivors, have shaped the building of networks around the right to reparation.

Zeitschrift für Friedens- und KonfliktforschungVol. 13(2)
University of Augsburg (DE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Institut für Zeitgeschichte München–Berlin (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.