Integrated Practical Framework for Multidisciplinary Prototype Design and Manufacturing Process

This article highlights the multidisciplinary approach of additive manufacturing employing ergonomics and reverse engineering in prototyping for practical applications. Based on a practical example, a personalized prototype was developed with reduced overall weight, improved air circulation, and an ergonomic design. Virtual testing demonstrated a suitable level of overall comfort, with a “Comfort” index score of 30.3, a “Back” assessment score of 6.5, and a “Rump” assessment score of 30.1. The use of digital ergonomic testing also helped eliminate costs and reduce the time required for prototype development. The final prototype was produced using Multi Jet Fusion technology. The entire process, from prototyping to real production, confirmed the suitability of the developed methodological framework for ergonomic prototyping through the application of reverse engineering. This approach forms the central focus of the article. In conclusion, the overall findings and benefits of the methodology for both science and practice are presented in alignment with the prototyping process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020454
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Practical Framework for Multidisciplinary Prototype Design and Manufacturing Process

Jozef Török, Darina Dupláková
3 citations
Processes
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
3.73
article

Integrated Practical Framework for Multidisciplinary Prototype Design and Manufacturing Process

Jozef Török, Darina Dupláková
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article highlights the multidisciplinary approach of additive manufacturing employing ergonomics and reverse engineering in prototyping for practical applications. Based on a practical example, a personalized prototype was developed with reduced overall weight, improved air circulation, and an ergonomic design. Virtual testing demonstrated a suitable level of overall comfort, with a “Comfort” index score of 30.3, a “Back” assessment score of 6.5, and a “Rump” assessment score of 30.1. The use of digital ergonomic testing also helped eliminate costs and reduce the time required for prototype development. The final prototype was produced using Multi Jet Fusion technology. The entire process, from prototyping to real production, confirmed the suitability of the developed methodological framework for ergonomic prototyping through the application of reverse engineering. This approach forms the central focus of the article. In conclusion, the overall findings and benefits of the methodology for both science and practice are presented in alignment with the prototyping process.

ProcessesVol. 13(2)
Technical University of Košice (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.