Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education

The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and large language models like LLama, Palm2, GPT, Gemini, and Claude has revolutionized education by generating human-like text and contextually relevant responses. Our research investigates the impact of structured prompt training on students' learning in data analysis and programming. We experimented with 157 first-year engineering students divided into three groups: a control group (internet access, no GenAI), an experimental group 1 (internet and GenAI without prompt training), and an experimental group 2 (internet and GenAI with prompt training). The prompt training session included techniques like few-shot prompting, chain prompting, and the CLEAR framework. We assessed participants' performance in data analysis tasks using Python, with pre-tests and post-tests measuring their skills in programming across three Bloom's taxonomy levels (understanding, application, and analysis). ANOVA on post-test scores showed significant differences among the groups, with G3 (with prompt training) outperforming G2 (without prompt training) and the control group across all three levels, evidenced by higher mean scores (G3: 6.60, G2: 4.94, Control: 4.28), similar pattern observed in task completion also. These results underscore the effectiveness of structured prompt training in enhancing students' data analysis and programming skills. Our study highlights the potential of GenAI and structured prompt training to transform educational practices and suggests future research directions, including integrating prompt engineering within human-AI collaboration. • GenAI (G2) outperformed internet search (G1) in understanding-level tasks. • Prompt training (G3) led to overall superior performance compared to G2 and G1. • Participants with prompt training reported better usability with Chat-GPT. • Prompt training boosts the effectiveness of GenAI for learning tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100380
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education

Ramkumar Rajendran, Ashish Garg, Nisumba Soodhani K
17 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
19.47
article

Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education

Ramkumar Rajendran, Ashish Garg, Nisumba Soodhani K
article en
17 citations

Abstract

The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and large language models like LLama, Palm2, GPT, Gemini, and Claude has revolutionized education by generating human-like text and contextually relevant responses. Our research investigates the impact of structured prompt training on students' learning in data analysis and programming. We experimented with 157 first-year engineering students divided into three groups: a control group (internet access, no GenAI), an experimental group 1 (internet and GenAI without prompt training), and an experimental group 2 (internet and GenAI with prompt training). The prompt training session included techniques like few-shot prompting, chain prompting, and the CLEAR framework. We assessed participants' performance in data analysis tasks using Python, with pre-tests and post-tests measuring their skills in programming across three Bloom's taxonomy levels (understanding, application, and analysis). ANOVA on post-test scores showed significant differences among the groups, with G3 (with prompt training) outperforming G2 (without prompt training) and the control group across all three levels, evidenced by higher mean scores (G3: 6.60, G2: 4.94, Control: 4.28), similar pattern observed in task completion also. These results underscore the effectiveness of structured prompt training in enhancing students' data analysis and programming skills. Our study highlights the potential of GenAI and structured prompt training to transform educational practices and suggests future research directions, including integrating prompt engineering within human-AI collaboration. • GenAI (G2) outperformed internet search (G1) in understanding-level tasks. • Prompt training (G3) led to overall superior performance compared to G2 and G1. • Participants with prompt training reported better usability with Chat-GPT. • Prompt training boosts the effectiveness of GenAI for learning tasks.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
19.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.