Integration of photovoltaic modules with phase change materials: Experimental testing, model validation and optimization

Phase Change Materials (PCMs) enhance Photovoltaic (PV) system efficiency by stabilizing operating temperatures, reducing heat-induced performance losses, and extending system lifespan. This study evaluates the thermal and electrical behavior of PCM-enhanced PV systems, validates a predictive model, and identifies optimal PCM configurations to maximize energy output. Experimental tests were performed over 47 days at the SolarTech LAB , Politecnico di Milano, Italy, on a standard PV module and three enhanced PV modules integrated with PCM. Three distinct PCMs, all composed of inorganic mineral-based compounds such as salt hydrates, were selected with melting temperatures of 18 °C, 29 °C, and 48 °C, respectively. Measurements included PV rear surface temperatures, heat fluxes, and power outputs. Thermal and electrical performance indicators, including electrical efficiency and final yield, were analyzed alongside detailed thermal analyses of phase change phenomena using charge and discharge indices. A new metric, the global energy gain ratio, is proposed to quantify the increase in electrical energy produced per unit of thermal energy stored by the PCM layer in a given period. The PV-PCM48 module increased energy output by 6.84% and reduced thermal stress with a maximum rear temperature drop of 26 °C, while the PV-PCM29 module improved output by 3.14%. The PV-PCM18 module showed a slight decrease of 0.65%. A lumped parameter model accurately predicted electrical performance and thermal dynamics. Parametric analysis revealed a 10 mm PCM48 layer and a 15 mm PCM29 layer as optimal, yielding, respectively, a further 0.7% and 0.5% increase in energy output compared to the corresponding experimental PV-PCM setups. A melting temperature of 45 °C led to a further increase in the energy output of 0.5% compared to the PV-PCM48 configuration. These findings demonstrate that the experimental PV-PCM configurations tested are close to their optimal conditions. • Three Photovoltaic (PV)-Phase Change Material (PCMs) modules were experimentally compared against a traditional PV module. • PCMs improved PV system energy output by up to 6.84 % and reduced PV rear temperatures by up to 26 °C. • A validated lumped parameter model accurately predicted thermal and electrical PV-PCM dynamics. • PV-PCM configurations were optimized in terms of PCM thickness and melting temperature. • Excessive PCM thickness negatively impacts performance due to excessive thermal insulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134959
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of photovoltaic modules with phase change materials: Experimental testing, model validation and optimization

Emanuèle Ogliari, Andrea Lucchini, Sonia Leva, Giampaolo Manzolini et al.
9 citations
Energy
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
3.27
article

Integration of photovoltaic modules with phase change materials: Experimental testing, model validation and optimization

Emanuèle Ogliari, Andrea Lucchini, Sonia Leva, Giampaolo Manzolini, Domenico Mazzeo, Alberto Dolara, Igor Matteo Carraretto, Luigi Pietro Maria Colombo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Phase Change Materials (PCMs) enhance Photovoltaic (PV) system efficiency by stabilizing operating temperatures, reducing heat-induced performance losses, and extending system lifespan. This study evaluates the thermal and electrical behavior of PCM-enhanced PV systems, validates a predictive model, and identifies optimal PCM configurations to maximize energy output. Experimental tests were performed over 47 days at the SolarTech LAB , Politecnico di Milano, Italy, on a standard PV module and three enhanced PV modules integrated with PCM. Three distinct PCMs, all composed of inorganic mineral-based compounds such as salt hydrates, were selected with melting temperatures of 18 °C, 29 °C, and 48 °C, respectively. Measurements included PV rear surface temperatures, heat fluxes, and power outputs. Thermal and electrical performance indicators, including electrical efficiency and final yield, were analyzed alongside detailed thermal analyses of phase change phenomena using charge and discharge indices. A new metric, the global energy gain ratio, is proposed to quantify the increase in electrical energy produced per unit of thermal energy stored by the PCM layer in a given period. The PV-PCM48 module increased energy output by 6.84% and reduced thermal stress with a maximum rear temperature drop of 26 °C, while the PV-PCM29 module improved output by 3.14%. The PV-PCM18 module showed a slight decrease of 0.65%. A lumped parameter model accurately predicted electrical performance and thermal dynamics. Parametric analysis revealed a 10 mm PCM48 layer and a 15 mm PCM29 layer as optimal, yielding, respectively, a further 0.7% and 0.5% increase in energy output compared to the corresponding experimental PV-PCM setups. A melting temperature of 45 °C led to a further increase in the energy output of 0.5% compared to the PV-PCM48 configuration. These findings demonstrate that the experimental PV-PCM configurations tested are close to their optimal conditions. • Three Photovoltaic (PV)-Phase Change Material (PCMs) modules were experimentally compared against a traditional PV module. • PCMs improved PV system energy output by up to 6.84 % and reduced PV rear temperatures by up to 26 °C. • A validated lumped parameter model accurately predicted thermal and electrical PV-PCM dynamics. • PV-PCM configurations were optimized in terms of PCM thickness and melting temperature. • Excessive PCM thickness negatively impacts performance due to excessive thermal insulation.

EnergyVol. 319
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.