Evaluating Current Statistical and Dynamical Forecasting Techniques for Seasonal Coastal Sea Level Prediction

Abstract The need for skillful seasonal prediction of coastal sea level anomalies (SLAs) has become increasingly evident as climate change has increased coastal flooding risks. Here, we evaluate nine current forecast systems by calculating deterministic and probabilistic skill from their retrospective forecasts (“hindcasts”) over 1995–2015, for lead times up to 6–9 months, at two U.S. tide gauge stations (Charleston, South Carolina, and San Diego, California). Additionally, we assess local skill enhancement by two postprocessing/downscaling techniques: an observation-based multivariate linear regression and a hybrid dynamical approach convolving sea level sensitivity to surface forcings with predicted surface forcing variations. All these approaches face challenges stemming from whether modeled SLAs sufficiently represent observed local coastal SLA variations because of ocean model limitations and inadequacies in model initialization and ensemble spread. Some of these issues also complicate the ability of the postprocessing techniques to improve probabilistic skill, even though they do somewhat improve deterministic skill. In general, deterministic hindcast skill is considerably higher for San Diego than Charleston, as expected from the stronger influence of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). However, ensemble spread metrics such as forecast reliability and sharpness remain low for both locations, highlighting model deficiencies in representing uncertainty. Additionally, evaluating how well any technique predicts seasonal coastal sea level variations is complicated by the forced trend component, particularly how it is estimated. Moreover, model skill is matched by a stochastically forced multivariate linear prediction model constructed from observations, suggesting that substantial improvement remains for predicting coastal seasonal SLAs, which could also include leveraging other predicted fields, including sea level pressure and prevailing winds. Significance Statement Coastal floodings have occurred more frequently in the last few decades, and it is anticipated that the number of such hazardous events will increase. Therefore, accurate and reliable forecasting of coastal water level is becoming increasingly important. This study thoroughly evaluated some current forecast techniques for sea level at two pilot study locations on the U.S. Coast (Charleston, South Carolina, and San Diego, California) and found that those techniques are still not capable to produce usable forecasting of anomalous sea level 3 months in advance, due to model inadequacy. The current generation of forecasting models was not designed for coastal sea level prediction, and we propose a few potential improvements that can potentially advance our capability in coastal sea level and inundation forecasting in the near future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-24-0214.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Current Statistical and Dynamical Forecasting Techniques for Seasonal Coastal Sea Level Prediction

William E. Sweet, Xiaoyu Long, Gregory Dusek, Matthew J. Widlansky et al.
3 citations
Journal of Climate
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
5.38
article

Evaluating Current Statistical and Dynamical Forecasting Techniques for Seasonal Coastal Sea Level Prediction

William E. Sweet, Xiaoyu Long, Gregory Dusek, Matthew J. Widlansky, Magdelena Balmeseda, John P. Krasting, Tong Lee, Matthew Newman, Sang‐Ik Shin, Yan Wang, Ou Wang, Cameron Lee, Liwei Jia, John W. Callahan, Benjamín Kirtman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The need for skillful seasonal prediction of coastal sea level anomalies (SLAs) has become increasingly evident as climate change has increased coastal flooding risks. Here, we evaluate nine current forecast systems by calculating deterministic and probabilistic skill from their retrospective forecasts (“hindcasts”) over 1995–2015, for lead times up to 6–9 months, at two U.S. tide gauge stations (Charleston, South Carolina, and San Diego, California). Additionally, we assess local skill enhancement by two postprocessing/downscaling techniques: an observation-based multivariate linear regression and a hybrid dynamical approach convolving sea level sensitivity to surface forcings with predicted surface forcing variations. All these approaches face challenges stemming from whether modeled SLAs sufficiently represent observed local coastal SLA variations because of ocean model limitations and inadequacies in model initialization and ensemble spread. Some of these issues also complicate the ability of the postprocessing techniques to improve probabilistic skill, even though they do somewhat improve deterministic skill. In general, deterministic hindcast skill is considerably higher for San Diego than Charleston, as expected from the stronger influence of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). However, ensemble spread metrics such as forecast reliability and sharpness remain low for both locations, highlighting model deficiencies in representing uncertainty. Additionally, evaluating how well any technique predicts seasonal coastal sea level variations is complicated by the forced trend component, particularly how it is estimated. Moreover, model skill is matched by a stochastically forced multivariate linear prediction model constructed from observations, suggesting that substantial improvement remains for predicting coastal seasonal SLAs, which could also include leveraging other predicted fields, including sea level pressure and prevailing winds. Significance Statement Coastal floodings have occurred more frequently in the last few decades, and it is anticipated that the number of such hazardous events will increase. Therefore, accurate and reliable forecasting of coastal water level is becoming increasingly important. This study thoroughly evaluated some current forecast techniques for sea level at two pilot study locations on the U.S. Coast (Charleston, South Carolina, and San Diego, California) and found that those techniques are still not capable to produce usable forecasting of anomalous sea level 3 months in advance, due to model inadequacy. The current generation of forecasting models was not designed for coastal sea level prediction, and we propose a few potential improvements that can potentially advance our capability in coastal sea level and inundation forecasting in the near future.

Journal of ClimateVol. 38(6)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), NOAA National Ocean Service (US), University of Hawaii System (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Miami (US), Kent State University (US), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), NOAA Ocean Exploration (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US), OAI Consulting (United States) (US), NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.