Impact of comammox process on membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for autotrophic nitrogen removal

• Model-based comparative analysis on comammox-exclusive/inclusive MABRs. • Up to ∼88 % TN removal with < 0.06 % N 2 O production via comammox bacteria-based PN/A. • Moderate HRT of 4.0 d and biofilm thickness of ≥ 300 μm assured MABRs’ performance. This study compared the simulation results of the side-stream membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) in terms of total nitrogen (TN) removal and N 2 O production obtained by the conventional comammox-exclusive biological nitrogen removal (BNR) model and the novel BNR model with comammox-related model structures/parameters. Even though the conventional comammox-exclusive MABR obtained >85 % TN removal over a wide range of substrate conditions and achieved up to ∼92.0 % TN removal, it suffered from 0.90 %-4.80 % N 2 O production. Comparatively, despite the significantly lower N 2 O production (0.01 %-0.06 %), due to the undesired full nitrification of comammox bacteria, the novel comammox-inclusive MABR failed to provide adequate nitrite for anammox bacteria under exceeding substrate conditions and only obtained the maximum ∼88.0 % TN removal through comammox bacteria-based partial nitritation/anammox. Both MABRs should be operated at a moderate hydraulic retention time (e.g., 4.0 d) with a sufficient biofilm thickness (e.g., ≥300 μm) to attain efficient TN removal and reduced N 2 O production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research X
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100318
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of comammox process on membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for autotrophic nitrogen removal

Ying Zhu, Bing‐Jie Ni, Fangang Meng, Xueming Chen et al.
4 citations
Water Research X
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
2.01
article

Impact of comammox process on membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for autotrophic nitrogen removal

Ying Zhu, Bing‐Jie Ni, Fangang Meng, Xueming Chen, Jiaying Hou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Model-based comparative analysis on comammox-exclusive/inclusive MABRs. • Up to ∼88 % TN removal with < 0.06 % N 2 O production via comammox bacteria-based PN/A. • Moderate HRT of 4.0 d and biofilm thickness of ≥ 300 μm assured MABRs’ performance. This study compared the simulation results of the side-stream membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) in terms of total nitrogen (TN) removal and N 2 O production obtained by the conventional comammox-exclusive biological nitrogen removal (BNR) model and the novel BNR model with comammox-related model structures/parameters. Even though the conventional comammox-exclusive MABR obtained >85 % TN removal over a wide range of substrate conditions and achieved up to ∼92.0 % TN removal, it suffered from 0.90 %-4.80 % N 2 O production. Comparatively, despite the significantly lower N 2 O production (0.01 %-0.06 %), due to the undesired full nitrification of comammox bacteria, the novel comammox-inclusive MABR failed to provide adequate nitrite for anammox bacteria under exceeding substrate conditions and only obtained the maximum ∼88.0 % TN removal through comammox bacteria-based partial nitritation/anammox. Both MABRs should be operated at a moderate hydraulic retention time (e.g., 4.0 d) with a sufficient biofilm thickness (e.g., ≥300 μm) to attain efficient TN removal and reduced N 2 O production.

Water Research XVol. 28
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), UNSW Sydney (AU), Fuzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.