The microclimate, surface energy flux and human skin burn risks of artificial turf as compared to natural turf

• Artificial turf had significantly greater air temperatures than natural turf at 1.5m. • Artificial turf did not decrease human thermal stress (UTCI). • The maximum hourly mean surface temperature of artificial turf was 71.6 °C. • Artificial turf posed a risk of skin burn for almost four hours of the day. • Artificial turf had high surface temperatures due to low albedo and low evaporation. There are increasing concerns over the human heat stress and burn risks of using artificial turf in private outdoor spaces such as backyards. This study aimed to compare the microclimate, human heat stress, surface energy fluxes, and human skin burn risk of artificial turf as compared to natural turf in a backyard environment in summer in Melbourne, Australia. The outdoor experiment consisted of nine identical plots (6 × 6 m) with three treatments (each treatment had three replicates): artificial turf, unirrigated natural turf, and irrigated natural turf (4 mm d –1 ). These three treatments were measured continuously for 51 days during summer. The artificial turf had significantly greater daytime (10:00–16:59 local time) mean air temperature (28.8 °C) than the unirrigated (28.2 °C) and irrigated (28.0 °C) natural turf. The differences in daytime mean radiant temperature among the treatments were too small to make a noticeable difference in human heat stress, measured in universal thermal climate index and wet-bulb globe temperature. The artificial turf had significantly greater daytime mean turf surface temperature (49.9 °C) than the unirrigated (31.7 °C) and irrigated (29.9 °C) natural turf. The turf surface temperature of the artificial turf exceeded the 48 °C skin burn threshold for almost four hours of the day when averaged over the 51 days of measurement. The lower albedo of artificial turf (0.09) increased the absorption of incoming shortwave radiation, compared to natural turf (0.19). The lower specific heat capacity of artificial turf also led to its greater surface temperature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112679
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aeolian processes and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The microclimate, surface energy flux and human skin burn risks of artificial turf as compared to natural turf

Stephen J. Livesley, Pui Kwan Cheung
1 citations
Building and Environment
Aeolian processes and effects
1.67
article

The microclimate, surface energy flux and human skin burn risks of artificial turf as compared to natural turf

Stephen J. Livesley, Pui Kwan Cheung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Artificial turf had significantly greater air temperatures than natural turf at 1.5m. • Artificial turf did not decrease human thermal stress (UTCI). • The maximum hourly mean surface temperature of artificial turf was 71.6 °C. • Artificial turf posed a risk of skin burn for almost four hours of the day. • Artificial turf had high surface temperatures due to low albedo and low evaporation. There are increasing concerns over the human heat stress and burn risks of using artificial turf in private outdoor spaces such as backyards. This study aimed to compare the microclimate, human heat stress, surface energy fluxes, and human skin burn risk of artificial turf as compared to natural turf in a backyard environment in summer in Melbourne, Australia. The outdoor experiment consisted of nine identical plots (6 × 6 m) with three treatments (each treatment had three replicates): artificial turf, unirrigated natural turf, and irrigated natural turf (4 mm d –1 ). These three treatments were measured continuously for 51 days during summer. The artificial turf had significantly greater daytime (10:00–16:59 local time) mean air temperature (28.8 °C) than the unirrigated (28.2 °C) and irrigated (28.0 °C) natural turf. The differences in daytime mean radiant temperature among the treatments were too small to make a noticeable difference in human heat stress, measured in universal thermal climate index and wet-bulb globe temperature. The artificial turf had significantly greater daytime mean turf surface temperature (49.9 °C) than the unirrigated (31.7 °C) and irrigated (29.9 °C) natural turf. The turf surface temperature of the artificial turf exceeded the 48 °C skin burn threshold for almost four hours of the day when averaged over the 51 days of measurement. The lower albedo of artificial turf (0.09) increased the absorption of incoming shortwave radiation, compared to natural turf (0.19). The lower specific heat capacity of artificial turf also led to its greater surface temperature.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 273
Ecosystem Sciences (AU)
Hort Innovation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Aeolian processes and effects
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.