Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein–Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Patients newly referred to palliative care. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [<i>n</i> = 103], 0.1-1.2 [<i>n</i> = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [<i>n</i> = 269]). The adjusted <i>p</i> values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0471
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein–Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer

Yu Uneno, Vickie E. Baracos, Koji Amano, Mika Baba et al.
1 citations
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Nutrition and Health in Aging
1.16
article

Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein–Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer

Yu Uneno, Vickie E. Baracos, Koji Amano, Mika Baba, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Tomofumi Miura, Hiroto Ishiki, Tatsuya Morita, Jun Hamano, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Satomi Okamura, Naoharu Mori, Naosuke Yokomichi, Masanori Mori
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Patients newly referred to palliative care. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [<i>n</i> = 103], 0.1-1.2 [<i>n</i> = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [<i>n</i> = 269]). The adjusted <i>p</i> values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.

Journal of Palliative MedicineVol. 28(5)
University of Tsukuba (JP), University of Alberta (CA), Aichi Medical University (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP), Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital (JP), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Suita Tokushukai Hospital (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Osaka University Hospital (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.