A survey on deep-learning-based gaze direction regression: searching for the state-of-the-art

In this paper, we present a survey of deep learning-based methods for the regression of gaze direction vector from head and eye images. We describe in detail numerous published methods with a focus on the input data, architecture of the model, and loss function used to supervise the model. Additionally, we present a list of datasets that can be used to train and evaluate gaze direction regression methods. Furthermore, we noticed that the results reported in the literature are often not comparable one to another due to differences in the validation or even test subsets used. To address this problem, we re-evaluated several methods on the commonly used in-the-wild Gaze360 dataset using the same validation setup. The experimental results show that the latest methods, although claiming state-of-the-art results, significantly underperform compared with some older methods. Finally, we show that the temporal models outperform the static models under static test conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3056347
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey on deep-learning-based gaze direction regression: searching for the state-of-the-art

Franko Šikić, Sven Lončarić, Donik Vršnak
2 citations
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
article

A survey on deep-learning-based gaze direction regression: searching for the state-of-the-art

Franko Šikić, Sven Lončarić, Donik Vršnak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we present a survey of deep learning-based methods for the regression of gaze direction vector from head and eye images. We describe in detail numerous published methods with a focus on the input data, architecture of the model, and loss function used to supervise the model. Additionally, we present a list of datasets that can be used to train and evaluate gaze direction regression methods. Furthermore, we noticed that the results reported in the literature are often not comparable one to another due to differences in the validation or even test subsets used. To address this problem, we re-evaluated several methods on the commonly used in-the-wild Gaze360 dataset using the same validation setup. The experimental results show that the latest methods, although claiming state-of-the-art results, significantly underperform compared with some older methods. Finally, we show that the temporal models outperform the static models under static test conditions.

University of Zagreb (HR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A survey on deep-learning-based gaze direction regression: searching for the state-of-the-art — Franko Šikić, Sven Lončarić, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS