Trade-Space Assessment of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft

In this paper, we assess the feasibility of turbo-, hybrid-, and fully electric civil aircraft propulsion systems. A modular optimization framework was developed to quantify system performance for a single-aisle transport aircraft with a mission similar to a Boeing 737-800. Various propulsion systems leveraging superconducting motors, boundary-layer ingestion, distributed electric propulsion, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, and liquid hydrogen fuel were examined for the same notional aircraft. Conventional aviation turbine fuel and liquid hydrogen were compared using the payload-fuel energy intensity, the fuel energy required per product of range and payload. For the chosen mission, the energy intensity of the hydrogen-fueled fully electric configuration was similar to that of the conventionally fueled twin turbofan baseline but produced zero carbon dioxide or nitrogen oxide emissions during flight. Relative to this baseline, a hydrogen-fueled turbofan system had the lowest energy intensity. Energy intensity increased when adding fuel cells to a turboelectric system or batteries to a fully electric, fuel-cell-powered system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037773
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-Space Assessment of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft

Phillip J. Ansell, Elias Waddington, Jason Merret, David K. Hall et al.
2 citations
Journal of Aircraft
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
9.99
article

Trade-Space Assessment of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft

Phillip J. Ansell, Elias Waddington, Jason Merret, David K. Hall, Andrew S. White
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we assess the feasibility of turbo-, hybrid-, and fully electric civil aircraft propulsion systems. A modular optimization framework was developed to quantify system performance for a single-aisle transport aircraft with a mission similar to a Boeing 737-800. Various propulsion systems leveraging superconducting motors, boundary-layer ingestion, distributed electric propulsion, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, and liquid hydrogen fuel were examined for the same notional aircraft. Conventional aviation turbine fuel and liquid hydrogen were compared using the payload-fuel energy intensity, the fuel energy required per product of range and payload. For the chosen mission, the energy intensity of the hydrogen-fueled fully electric configuration was similar to that of the conventionally fueled twin turbofan baseline but produced zero carbon dioxide or nitrogen oxide emissions during flight. Relative to this baseline, a hydrogen-fueled turbofan system had the lowest energy intensity. Energy intensity increased when adding fuel cells to a turboelectric system or batteries to a fully electric, fuel-cell-powered system.

Journal of AircraftVol. 62(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trade-Space Assessment of Liquid Hydrogen Propulsion Systems for Electrified Aircraft — Phillip J. Ansell, Elias Waddington, et al. · Journal of Aircraft (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS