Understanding High-Speed Aeroelastic Stability of a Gimballed Proprotor

A 4.75-ft-diameter dynamically scaled proprotor was tested on a semispan wing pylon in airplane mode up to high speeds of 200 kt. Aeroelastic stability data was acquired at two wind tunnels: Navy Carderock tunnel and the University of Maryland Glenn L. Martin tunnel, and for two hub configurations: gimballed and gimbal locked. The data consisted of frequency and damping of beam, chord, and torsion modes of the coupled rotor–wing-pylon system at a Froude-scale rpm of 1050. The eigenvalues were extracted with moving-block and Prony methods and were compared. The tests shed light on the nature of roots in high-speed tiltrotor flight. The key conclusions were the following: 1) the beam and chord damping for the gimballed rotor remained low, around 1–2%; 2) torsion damping was higher, around 3–6%; 3) the gimbal-locked condition increased chord and torsion damping significantly and also changed their trends with speed; 4) the model remained flutter-free up to 200 kt, which is equivalent to 458 kt in full scale; and 5) moving block and Prony are methods equally effective for extracting damping from time-series data for these test conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037994
Primary Topic
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding High-Speed Aeroelastic Stability of a Gimballed Proprotor

Akinola Akinwale, Anubhav Datta
Journal of Aircraft
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
article

Understanding High-Speed Aeroelastic Stability of a Gimballed Proprotor

Akinola Akinwale, Anubhav Datta
article en

Abstract

A 4.75-ft-diameter dynamically scaled proprotor was tested on a semispan wing pylon in airplane mode up to high speeds of 200 kt. Aeroelastic stability data was acquired at two wind tunnels: Navy Carderock tunnel and the University of Maryland Glenn L. Martin tunnel, and for two hub configurations: gimballed and gimbal locked. The data consisted of frequency and damping of beam, chord, and torsion modes of the coupled rotor–wing-pylon system at a Froude-scale rpm of 1050. The eigenvalues were extracted with moving-block and Prony methods and were compared. The tests shed light on the nature of roots in high-speed tiltrotor flight. The key conclusions were the following: 1) the beam and chord damping for the gimballed rotor remained low, around 1–2%; 2) torsion damping was higher, around 3–6%; 3) the gimbal-locked condition increased chord and torsion damping significantly and also changed their trends with speed; 4) the model remained flutter-free up to 200 kt, which is equivalent to 458 kt in full scale; and 5) moving block and Prony are methods equally effective for extracting damping from time-series data for these test conditions.

Journal of AircraftVol. 62(2)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Penn State Vertical Lift Research Center of Excellence
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.